Kessler thought Froch did enough to win

Do you really think he would have to ask them?

 

This is why anyone that called it a robbery is being foolish. While I watch the fight I had a problem scoring at least 4 rounds. It just wasn't that clear who was winning. Of course the robbery people can't get it through their heads that a judge has only one side of the ring covered and can't possibly see everything that is happening. We need to get to Nov 7th asap so we can put all this robbery discussion to bed. (I'm sure it will happen again with a bunch of people claiming Valuev robbed Haye but thats just a prediction) :nut

 

direll blew it.

 

It depends on the way he loses. The way he won against Taylor raised some issues but proved Froch had heart and was adapting well in a ring. Unfortunately, against Dirrel, he had heart but was unable to adapt, got a decision he could have lost (should have IMO) and acted like a jerk after the bout. If he loses against Kessler in a horrible way, being able to land nothing but eating himsel a lot of leather, before being ko'd badly, it will be bad for him, even if it's against the best fighter of the division.

 

I'm from Canada and don't know what to think! Goddamn neutrality.