Kessler V Adamek

175 is light heavy, not cruiser if I'm understanding your post. I don't think Adamek can make CW anymore, but if he could he would KO him for sure.

 

atschatsch:rofl:rofl

 

Yeah, I'm not clear on whether RedDragonBoxing got confused abuot the limits for each division, or if he was implying that Adamek weighing in at 200 and Kessler somewhere between 175-200 would constitute a "catchweight" fight.

In any event, this is a terrible idea for Kessler. It's be like looking in the mirror at a supersized version of himself. A right hand specialist who is arguably his equal but much bigger and stronger? Yikes. I do think Mikkel is probably more skilled p4p but not enough to compensate - they're just too far apart.

Also, the risk/reward for Adamek makes no sense - it's the exact opposite of the path he's taken at HW.

 

Yeah I wasn't sure either, hence the edit.

 

Adamek = 1 boring fighter

 

Sarcasm, right?

 

What does he need to add to his game to wake you up? Pretty ballerina pirouettes to slip opponent's jabs, transitioning into a bolo counterpunch off his toes?

 

Adamek TKO in late rounds.

 

If they fight around 200, Adamek wins without doubt, possible KO. If they fight about 175, then Kessler on pionts.

Adamek is my fighter, so I vote on him

 

Not saying Kessler is a ***** on anything, he is one of my favourite fighters.

But i think Adamek is underated by alot of people who just think he is a come forward, defencesless fighter.

I think whilst Kessler has the better jab and straight right, Adameks size and pressure would negate Kesslers distance.

I can see the fight being competitive until the later rounds when Kessler would start to slow whilst Adamek would still be punching hard and coming on strong.

Just my view though:good

 

So my vote (Adamek on points) shouldnt be counted Right now if Adamek makes 175, he is done. 2005 version of Adamek would win imo.