Kessler v Bute

yeah, where the **** did I say otherwise?
i'm talking about KO

 

I hope that happens

 

'No you werent. You said in your last post "who the **** cares about KO ratio" And the you went on and said that Kessler has fought nobody. :rofl :rofl :rofl

 

i was talking about he was Koing a bunch of NOBODY
prove me wrong?
compare where Bute began to fight good boxer and compare the same thing for Kessler

 

Kessler has been fighting alot of bums but lets try and isolate the last four years. Who has the better competition, then? Kessler. They have equal KO ratio though.

 

why are we gonna isolate the last 4 year?
that's aint just for Bute, despite being 28 years old, he progressed way greater than Kessler was at his 20th fight..
At his 20th fight Bute was fighting Bika
at his 20th fight, Kessler was fighting Patrick Rubes(9-9)
I'm talking about THAT

 

All this is pretty stupid. It's obvious the power is more or less equal. Neither are one punch KO artists, they are just strong punchers.

 

Pavlik or Kessler in term of Power?im curious about your opinion

 

Pavlik, by a little

But again I doubt there is a huge amount in it. Pavlik throws more punches. Also imagine Kessler or Bute vs some of that shitty middleweight competition. They'd have a huge KO ratio too.

 

This post exists?

 

Kessler WAS more protected. Agreed. But that wasnt your initial claim in this thread. You said Bute punches harder and that Kessler has faced nobody.

Thats pretty harsh imho.

 

You're wrong. Bute has an 82% ko ratio. Kessler has 75%.

 

Bute's also 28, how old was Kessler around his 20th bout? Kessler was brought up slower, turned pro much younger than Bute.

Not the same thing. Bute and Kessler both, on their best nights from here on out, are about as good as they will get.

 

Ok. But they still have about the same power.

 

Agree totally :good