Kessler vs Calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DanishDestroyer, May 30, 2012.


  1. W1LLPARK3R

    W1LLPARK3R Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,626
    0
    Feb 16, 2011
    no....JC would always be too fast for a fighter with Kessler's style..
     
  2. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,266
    2,207
    Apr 25, 2008
    There was no 115-113. It was 116-112 x2 and 117-111. Clear Calzaghe win.

    Most people here probably haven't seen the fight.
     
  3. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,266
    2,207
    Apr 25, 2008
    I can agree with that.
     
  4. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,266
    2,207
    Apr 25, 2008
    This. I remember post PW vs Martinez everybody was more or less saying it was a fair decision, then after the rematch everybody was saying it was a robbery.
     
  5. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,266
    2,207
    Apr 25, 2008
    Danish Destroyer is a neutral??? ok. 117-111 Calzaghe.
     
  6. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,266
    2,207
    Apr 25, 2008
    Complete and utter bollecks.
     
  7. DanishDestroyer

    DanishDestroyer Member Full Member

    180
    0
    May 23, 2012
    Tell me why you only give Kessler 3 ****ing rounds?
    - He won 5 rounds!
     
  8. zulander

    zulander Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,775
    1,431
    Mar 17, 2006
    Not really all those fighters lost against guys they would always loose to
    Hatton wouldn't beat pac and floyd at home
    Haye wouldnt beat wlad at home.
    Froch wouldn't beat Ward etc etc. Some fights the location makes little difference

    plus these days fighting away from home ie the states comes with the step up in class
     
  9. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,266
    2,207
    Apr 25, 2008
    Because he only won 3 maybe 4 at best.
     
  10. DanishDestroyer

    DanishDestroyer Member Full Member

    180
    0
    May 23, 2012
    No!

    Round 1 - Calzaghe 9-10 Kessler
    Round 2 - Calzaghe 9-10 Kessler
    Round 3 - Calzaghe 10-9 Kessler
    Round 4 - Calzaghe 9-10 Kessler
    Round 5 - Calzaghe 10-9 Kessler
    Round 6 - Calzaghe 10-9 Kessler
    Round 7 - Calzaghe 9-10 Kessler
    Round 8 - Calzaghe 10-9 Kessler
    Round 9 - Calzaghe 10-9 Kessler
    Round 10 - Calzaghe 10-9 Kessler
    Round 11 - Calzaghe 10-9 Kessler
    Round 12 - Calzaghe 9-10 Kessler
    --------------Calzaghe 115-113 Kessler - NO DOUBT ABOUT IT!
     
  11. suckeggs

    suckeggs Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,625
    5
    Jan 21, 2009
    That's your opinion... and you're not biased at all are you?

    Calzaghe clearly won that fight. You said earlier too that if Kessler had got the W it wouldn't have been a robbery.... yes it ****ing would... it would have been up there with Lewis v Holyfield 1
     
  12. Geoffers

    Geoffers Active Member Full Member

    991
    15
    Feb 2, 2008
    Mr DanishDestroyer, why do you seem to think that your opinion is the only one that counts?
     
  13. DanishDestroyer

    DanishDestroyer Member Full Member

    180
    0
    May 23, 2012
    Ohh so you are saying that Mikkel did more worse than Williams against Lara, Rios vs Abril??
     
  14. DanishDestroyer

    DanishDestroyer Member Full Member

    180
    0
    May 23, 2012
    I haven´t said that. I must have missed it.
     
  15. Faetter_BR

    Faetter_BR Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,778
    0
    Aug 4, 2004
    Well you kinda said "NO DOUBT ABOUT IT" about your scorecard - that sorta indicates that people scoring it otherwise are wrong, and that you are right... :)