Kessler vs Calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Alo2006, Jul 17, 2007.


  1. Alo2006

    Alo2006 R.I.P Sean Taylor Full Member

    10,021
    1,414
    Jun 28, 2006
    It's on Nov 3 :good Who u rolling with? I'm with Kessler :bbb
     
  2. djb2009

    djb2009 Member Full Member

    467
    0
    Jan 7, 2007
    Calzaghe all the way
     
  3. Shotgun

    Shotgun Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,730
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    Calzaghe is going to win a decisive UD and bust Kessler up. It won't be a whitewash like the Lacy fight, but it'll be clear. Kessler has never been in there with anyone close to Calzaghe's level, he is good with a great one-two but he's not on JC's level, and his conventional style isn't going to throw anything at Joe that Joe hasn't already seen before. Calzaghe always elevates for big fights. Joe's speed, workrate and his impossible to replicate in training style will be too much for Kessler :good
     
  4. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
  5. Alo2006

    Alo2006 R.I.P Sean Taylor Full Member

    10,021
    1,414
    Jun 28, 2006
    We shall see :yep
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,853
    81,821
    Nov 30, 2006
    Since when does having a conventional style preclude talent as a basis for prediction? What, Calzaghe can only lose to Toney or Darchinyan?
     
  7. Shotgun

    Shotgun Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,730
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    It doesn't. But Kessler's style is fairly one dimensional and it's a very conventional style. Meaning it'll be much easier for Calzaghe to formulate a gameplan based on past experience. Kessler's stepping into the ring with someone totally unlike anything he's ever seen, who you can't even get sparring partners to accurately replicate. That is an advantage to Calzaghe, and I didn't say that Calzaghe's just going to win because Kessler has a conventional style. It's not the "basis for a prediction", it's one of multiple factors that I'm taking into account

    And if we're talking talent level Calzaghe is more talented and also more tested
     
  8. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    I have Kessler, good enough all round boxer for a past prime Calzaghe -fullstop-
     
  9. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    I love this strategy! It is win-win!
     
  10. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    No, it damages my prediction record, unfortunately-slash-fortunately I am right -fullstop-
     
  11. Fab2333

    Fab2333 Needs to Get It 2Gether Full Member

    5,359
    2
    Oct 25, 2006
    yup i see that as well
     
  12. Shotgun

    Shotgun Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,730
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    Calzaghe losing wouldn't really be a massive upset. Kessler is a very good boxer who combines good fundamental skills with well above average athleticism. I just don't think he's good enough to beat Calzaghe unless Calzaghe has lost a step or two which I don't think he has
     
  13. marting

    marting Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,616
    2,246
    Jul 20, 2004
    Probably Calzaghe. Once again he's fighting at home in front of his rabid fans. And with the right ref this thing could be over quickly if Kessler comes out slow.

    Is it fair to say that Kessler is the best fighter that Calzaghe has faced?
     
  14. duran77

    duran77 New Member Full Member

    98
    1
    Jan 8, 2007
    China hand Joe predicting full stop for Kessler? What is th world coming to? What if your wrong? If Calazaghe wins will it break your heart that you picked against him?
     
  15. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    If JC wins, China Joe will probably say: even though he was past his second prime, Joe outdid himself to beat a top P4P fighter.