Kessler vs Froch I, II were prime vs prime?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by *BOX_FAN*, May 26, 2013.


  1. tobias

    tobias Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,684
    0
    Feb 27, 2012
    Froch was not in prime in Denmark. Kessler was in prime in London. Danes always searching for excuses.
     
  2. Vanihm

    Vanihm Active Member Full Member

    1,288
    0
    Mar 6, 2008
    Yes, as we all know NO ONE in th UK made excuses when Froch lost in Herning :roll::roll::roll::roll::roll:...
     
  3. Vanihm

    Vanihm Active Member Full Member

    1,288
    0
    Mar 6, 2008
    Maybe not Green og Magee, but Mundine was a top guy at the time and still managed to later beat a prime Danny Green and near-prime Daniel Geale, both of whom would later be champs in their respective divisions. Beyer was a three time champ and would have been considered a legend had he been from the US. Prima Andrade would have given Froch problems, no doubt about that.
    Sartison actually looked quite promising untill his knee got f*****.

    Kessler's problem (like Joe untill the Lacy fight) was that most of the opposition at the time was uninteresting for the US fans, and thus never really got appreciated. Some people (including Williem Dettloff of the Ring) actually thought Kessler had beaten better opposition than Calzaghe when they fought!
     
  4. tobias

    tobias Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,684
    0
    Feb 27, 2012
    :patsch Yeah, I forgot that. Sorry. **** them off then! :good :yep
     
  5. kk17

    kk17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,168
    900
    Jun 23, 2007
    :good