Why would Kessler beat Pavlik cause BHop did? Kessler is a ****ing statue and does not have the footwork or rythym Bhop does Im going with Pavlik.
Didn't you just say in another thread that Pavlik isn;t even interesting because Kessler would easily win and therefore you wouldn't be at all impressed if he beat Pavlik?? :huh Can you make up your mind. Would Pavlik be a good win for Kessler, or is Kessler just so much better than Pavlik that the fight doesn't even matter?
Umm... lets see. Kessler has better defense than Taylor. Better handspeed, better power, better accuracy, straighter punches, throws better combinations, beter balance, has a better jab, a better arsenal, a better chin, and a better boxing brain. I think the REAL question is.. whats taylor have over Kessler? Answer... not a goddamn thing, besides more hype.
What i meant to say was that kelly and taylor would beat kessler. Taylor cant beat pavlik but maybe in a couple years though
What in the hell is gonna change in a couple of years that'll allow Taylor to beat Pavlik? Kelly beats JT everytime. And can you please explain how Taylor would beat Kessler? Cause I fail to see it. Kessler would Taylor's ass. The ONLY question would be whether or not JT would last the distance. My guess is no. Next thing you'll be saying is that Taylor can beat Dawson.:rofl