kesslers got something on the line saturday night

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by van the man, Apr 16, 2008.


  1. HolgerD

    HolgerD Armscontrol Full Member

    1,716
    0
    Sep 6, 2007
    What does it take for you to give some respect to 168? Just curious.
     
  2. HolgerD

    HolgerD Armscontrol Full Member

    1,716
    0
    Sep 6, 2007
    Sounds reasonable to me.:good
     
  3. rendog67

    rendog67 The firestarter Full Member

    2,167
    1
    Apr 27, 2006
    yeah you are right there, if calzaghe loses badly it will make him look very bad
     
  4. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Deal! Fair is fair!

    If Hopkins wins 4 rounds, Calzaghe and Kessler were overrated and Hopkins - underrated.:deal

    Last man to win 4 rounds over Calzaghe, except Kessler, was Bika - and we all know how and why.
     
  5. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    It's true that Kessler's style was good for Calzaghe and that Hopkins' style is bad. However, there's a big difference in speed, stamina and workrate. Let's not forget that either. On the whole, Hopkins shouldn't win more than 3 rounds, unless Calzaghe is overrated and Hopkins - underrated. Fair is fair.
     
  6. denilo

    denilo Member Full Member

    316
    0
    Sep 28, 2007
     
  7. THN

    THN Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,386
    0
    Apr 8, 2007
    Bull****, if it was so easy I would be rich.
     
  8. Cruiser1

    Cruiser1 Champion Emeritus Full Member

    4,622
    2
    Feb 23, 2005
    One thing has nothing to do with the other. Calzaghe and Kessler had been unified champions and their fight was huge. I don't need to see a particular result on Saturday night to further validate whether or not Kessler's a legitimate fighter. Give me a break.