Kevin "The Hack" Iole suspicious of Kessler's injury, but not of Dirrell's - surprise

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigBone, Oct 8, 2010.


  1. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,464
    1,726
    Nov 20, 2007
    Kevin "The Hack" Iole's biased stupidity just never stops. Only a month after he straight out accused Kessler of lying out of the tournament (and giving up his hard won belt without a guarantee at the moment of being inserted to champion emeritus), Iole doesn't even think Dirrell's pullout has anything to do with him NOT WANTING TO FIGHT BEST FRIEND ANDRE WARD.

    Iole wrote a few weeks ago:

    "The pre-tournament favorite, Kessler announced his withdrawal complaining of double vision. Color me skeptical at that news. I became even more suspicious of Kessler’s injury after seeing Showtime’s Fight Camp 360 on Wednesday, in which Kessler was driving his car and talking to the camera after he had withdrawn from the tournament. If he has double vision, is it a good idea to be driving a car at all, let alone while keeping only partial attention on the road? I think not. Further, his doctor said he’ll be fine after eight months of rest – no surgery needed, miraculously – just at a time when he will be able to resume training and potentially fight the tournament winner."

    It's interesting, because Dirrell also gave Showtime an interview and also said he's perfectly okay and ready to fight - despite promoters not even sending the Andres into camp becasue they admittingly didn't want to fight each other despite signing the contract that made it clear they should clash in R3. Further, Dirrell's doctor said Andre can go back into camp 3 months after "symptom-free" (is 'friendship' the symptom?), so the Matrix can come back whenever he wants, without fighting Ward and getting sued by Showtime, but that doesn't make Kevin Iole suspicious in his latest article. I'm not saying Dirrell doesn't have neurological symptoms - how would I know? But due to the past months of Ward-Dirrell histeria, we all have every reason to be suspicious of the "sudden" turn of event, so why the conspiracy theorist hack of Yahoo sports that accused Kessler isn't?

    Color me skeptical, but Kevin Iole is a biased hack.
     
  2. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,176
    27,897
    Jan 18, 2010
    Indeed.

    There was no legitimate reason for Mikkel to step out if he wasn't really injured, because he was fighting freakin' Green next. You can't hope for an easier opponent to defend your title against and getting paid a big amount for it also. If he was to pull out with some bogus injury, he would do it AFTER the Green bout. Now he lost his belt, and if he wants to get it back he probably has to face the Super6 winner for that.

    Dirrell on the other hand is a total different story.
    If he was to pull out, now is the perfect time... Facing his friend and tourny favorite Ward, plus all the fuzz before the fight (no venue, hometown advantage issues) and the fact they both didn't train makes it a lot more suspicious than the Kessler situation.

    But the big difference is... Kessler is from Denmark, and Dirrell is from the good ol' US of A.

    P.S. after hearing some of the background of Andre's injury, I won't go either way in if he's on the level or not until there's some actual proof.
     
  3. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    People actually doubt Kessler?!

    That just seems strange to me. I don't think you're likely to find many more honest people in boxing than him, and he has always shown a desire to prove himself. If he has lied, it would be out of character. Why wouldn't he want to fight Green, anyway? He's clearly the poorest fighter in the Super 6 and Kessler would have few issues, so I can't understand if he was going to pull out, why he'd face Froch and Ward, the best two so far, yet duck Green.
     
  4. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    I guess that's the frustrating thing because there's no way to prove or disprove anything about this.

    It just seems suspicious after all the broken negotiations that when Showtime force a date, after threatening legal action, Dirrell has a new found 'legitimate' reason to not fight.
     
  5. Uncle Oden

    Uncle Oden Respect Guzman banned

    6,753
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    to your point about why would Kessler avoid Green after fighting Ward and Froch. Why would Dirrell avoid Ward, not a devastating puncher, after fighting two big punchers in Froch and Abraham if he's the coward everyone makes him out to be?

    Dirrell had to give up a substantial payday, possibly two or more if he advanced. He could have very easily taken the fight, put on his dancing shoes, and still had a nice payday, and still very well possibly advanced.
     
  6. Uncle Oden

    Uncle Oden Respect Guzman banned

    6,753
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    you sure are interested in his opinions, though. You seem to post everyone of his articles that you disagree with. Obsess much?
     
  7. Doc (aka Meke)

    Doc (aka Meke) Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    5
    Oct 19, 2007
    I noticed the Kessler with with Iole and even started a thread. I never heard more stupid argument than the one Iole pulled on Kessler's injury. Lots of people pointed out the incredible comparison between driving and fighting...

    Kevin Iole is a shame for boxing... well, any MMA fan writing about boxing would be! :yep
     
  8. Doc (aka Meke)

    Doc (aka Meke) Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    5
    Oct 19, 2007
    1) Kessler hadn't already postponed fight with Green as was Dirrell with Ward.

    2) There were no rumors Kessler doesn't want to fight Green as it was the case with Dirrell and Ward

    3) Both have 2 points, but it is clear that kessler's chances against Green are much higher than Dirrell's against Ward. Dirrell may as well not advanced, probably the most likely scenario.

    4) Kessler never said Ward headbutts caused it but made sure to state it had started before Ward fight. Dirrell's team is taking a nasty route slandering another fighter although there is no whatsoever evidence to connect whatsoever problems he may have with that particular punch.
     
  9. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,464
    1,726
    Nov 20, 2007
    I think I have a fair solution that would be good for all parties:

    Let an indepentent neurologist examine and take notes of Dirrell's neurological status and here's the trick: the doc should NOT question Andre's neurologist, but if at any point Dirrell wants to come back the same doc should check whether Andre's status has improved. If not, Dirrell shouldn't be allowed to fight, because nothing changed from today, and if it improved, he's ready to fight and should. One way or another, it's a solid solution that should be acceptable for Dirrell, Showtime and the fans.

    And you seem to be interested in my threads. Obsess much?
     
  10. Uncle Oden

    Uncle Oden Respect Guzman banned

    6,753
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    1. Dirrell didn't postpone the fight. That's not how the business works.

    2. Rumors Rumors Rumors. Don't mean ****. Zero credible sources there.

    3. It was the most likely scenario? Show me how. It certainly was not the most likely scenario.

    4. Slandering Abraham? He hit the man when he was down. That's what they've said. Hardly slander.
     
  11. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    You say "why would Dirrell avoid Ward" but the question should be "why did Dirrell avoid Ward". We know that the fight should have already happened but both sides dragged their feet. We know they were forced into the November 27th date by Showtime or they'd face legal action. Dirrell never entered training camp for either date, so it's hard to believe they ever wanted the fight. I actually made a thread about this on the same day the story about Dirrell quitting the Super 6 broke, and said just how ridiculous it was that neither man was in training for the fight.

    Realistically, this fight was never close to being made.

    Aside from that, Dirrell should have been confident about beating Froch and Abraham because he has a huge styles advantage on both. He doesn't have that same advantage on Ward, so even though Froch and Abraham are bigger punchers, Ward is the most likely to beat Dirrell.
     
  12. Doc (aka Meke)

    Doc (aka Meke) Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    5
    Oct 19, 2007
    There's not much point in arguing with you, isn't it? :hi:
     
  13. Uncle Oden

    Uncle Oden Respect Guzman banned

    6,753
    0
    Feb 7, 2009

    and now you know why he wasn't in training. The question has been answered. Stop being so thick. If you're upset that this wasn't brought to everyone's attention awhile back, that's your problem. It's obvious the team was hoping symptoms would eventually subside, but they were going to keep that internal until they realized he was not at a point where he could go forward fighting.
     
  14. Uncle Oden

    Uncle Oden Respect Guzman banned

    6,753
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    not if you're going to bring nonsense to the table, as you just did.
     
  15. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    Hack who? Esbers know who is a pretending little ***** and who is a warrior.



    I've got a headache.....can't fight.
    Line up next to void; dirrell ya little slut.