Khan and Floyd- polar opposite standards

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hoopsman, May 4, 2014.


  1. hoopsman

    hoopsman Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,528
    2,155
    Jul 24, 2005
    If Floyd gets hit at all, he's an overrated cherry picker.

    If Khan doesn't hit the deck, he's back on the ATG fast track.

    Some of this Khan sh*t is ridiculous. Indeed I read one idiot saying Khan's this era's Tommy Hearns, as if his punching power is even in the same galaxy as the Hitman's!:patsch
     
  2. VictorS.

    VictorS. Member Full Member

    395
    1
    Oct 7, 2012
    Mayweather is an all-time great. Khan is a fighter that has had an up and down career. He's had some big wins and some tough losses. One of Mayweather's biggest critiques of Khan was his lack of impressiveness in his fight vs. Diaz. This time, Khan was very impressive and Mayweather wasn't. While Mayweather is still a favorite vs anyone, his stock definitely dropped and he tries to fool everyone by saying "he was trying to give the fans what they want." Well, I thought it ain't cool to get hit??? Which one is it Floyd??
     
  3. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,357
    7,937
    Sep 2, 2011
    Lol, I do not see these "standards" you just described here, or at least not the Khan one.
     
  4. hoopsman

    hoopsman Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,528
    2,155
    Jul 24, 2005
    You're generally an excellent poster. Read a few of the "Khan's back" posts.
     
  5. Mexi-Box

    Mexi-Box Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,809
    8
    Apr 19, 2013
    If Floyd clinches excessively, he's an ATG and put on a masterful performance.

    If Khan clinches excessively, he's a bum and doesn't know how to fight on the inside.

    If Wlad clinches excessively, he's a bum and doesn't know how to fight on the inside.

    Some of this **** is ridiculous :patsch