Now all that's left is the IBF to answer, if they don't know him then boy this fight is deffo heading for a N.C
I don't think it'll be changed to a NC. And nor should it, Khan lost fair and square, the right man on the night was declared the winner. If a rematch suits both parties, let's have it signed and make it the end of the matter. As it is, he's just making himself look like a whiny little ******. Whoever is running operations at Sky should just pull the story and give it no more coverage.
Khan will have to win his belts back in the ring, no way are they changing this result because some random man interferred with a supervisor. there is no evidence to suggest he had any influence anyway, they are asking who he is. unless "Hatman" is directy linked to Peterson then Peterson himself is not responsible for ringside security or making sure the supervisor is not harrassed and will not and cannot be punished for security issues. Khan will have to be humble and wait for his rematch.
a ten fight deal ? were did you read that pish you little cross dressing khan fanboy? http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/nov/10/amir-khan-three-fight-deal-sky
Not necessarily. If the WBA's scorecard had it a draw, and the IBF's one went missing (eliminating the chance to compare and confirm which one was tallied up wrong, and where it was tallied up wrong), then the there's a chance that the correct decision wasn't read out. The issue of Hatman :hat is just one of many that are flying around, and the bodies are investigating. With all of these considered, I can't see why anyone would expect Khan not to raise questions. There are a lot of loose ends, and if there's a chance he lost his titles unfairly, he's justified in searching for answers.
no that is not enough of a link, do you actually watch boxing? have you see some of the strange randoms who jump in the ring after a big fight just to be seen standing next to the champ?