Khan at it again

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by modestbiggles, Jan 5, 2012.


  1. Go Getta

    Go Getta Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,444
    0
    Sep 9, 2011
    Breaking news yellow bar at bottom of Sky Sports news right now
     
  2. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008
    On the yellow ticker thing
     
  3. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    good enough for me :good
     
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,470
    Sep 7, 2008
    He's nuttin' like me!
     
  5. Go Getta

    Go Getta Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,444
    0
    Sep 9, 2011
    Now all that's left is the IBF to answer, if they don't know him then boy this fight is deffo heading for a N.C
     
  6. Philphy Rich

    Philphy Rich Member Full Member

    482
    0
    Dec 8, 2007
    No they don't.
     
  7. Go Getta

    Go Getta Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,444
    0
    Sep 9, 2011
    Now IBF refusing to comment and seeking legal advise, and won't comment till Jan 17th hearing.
     
  8. I don't think it'll be changed to a NC.

    And nor should it, Khan lost fair and square, the right man on the night was declared the winner. If a rematch suits both parties, let's have it signed and make it the end of the matter.

    As it is, he's just making himself look like a whiny little ******. Whoever is running operations at Sky should just pull the story and give it no more coverage.
     
  9. RNS

    RNS Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,239
    0
    Jun 11, 2011

    Khan will have to win his belts back in the ring, no way are they changing this result because some random man interferred with a supervisor.

    there is no evidence to suggest he had any influence anyway, they are asking who he is.

    unless "Hatman" is directy linked to Peterson then Peterson himself is not responsible for ringside security or making sure the supervisor is not harrassed and will not and cannot be punished for security issues.

    Khan will have to be humble and wait for his rematch.
     
  10. alba

    alba Guess who? Full Member

    11,185
    2
    Jun 13, 2008
    a ten fight deal ? were did you read that pish you little cross dressing khan fanboy? :lol:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/nov/10/amir-khan-three-fight-deal-sky
     
  11. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    Ace is in fact 1 time Khan/Jihad fanatic Taco Bill
     
  12. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
  13. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Not necessarily. If the WBA's scorecard had it a draw, and the IBF's one went missing (eliminating the chance to compare and confirm which one was tallied up wrong, and where it was tallied up wrong), then the there's a chance that the correct decision wasn't read out.

    The issue of Hatman :hat is just one of many that are flying around, and the bodies are investigating.

    With all of these considered, I can't see why anyone would expect Khan not to raise questions. There are a lot of loose ends, and if there's a chance he lost his titles unfairly, he's justified in searching for answers.
     
  14. RNS

    RNS Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,239
    0
    Jun 11, 2011

    no that is not enough of a link, do you actually watch boxing?
    have you see some of the strange randoms who jump in the ring after a big fight just to be seen standing next to the champ?
     
  15. alba

    alba Guess who? Full Member

    11,185
    2
    Jun 13, 2008

    isint asif vali a "strange random" to most boxing peoiple