Khan at it again

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by modestbiggles, Jan 5, 2012.


  1. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest

    :patsch
     
  2. widdy

    widdy lancs,where real men live Full Member

    5,747
    0
    Aug 19, 2008
    the only bits you got right in that statement are the 1st "nowhere near as good as SRL" and the last "got a lot to learn":deal

    now thomas,im not calling you here,there are a lot of more,how can i say:think verbally gifted,better literature and cleverer folk on here than this lowly plasterer.
    but **** me,how much boxing do you watch,if you watch a lot,**** me,watch closer,cos most of that is bollocks what you have wrote:deal
     
  3. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    khan was trying to keep away. End of debate.
     
  4. zabs

    zabs Member Full Member

    175
    0
    Apr 19, 2011
    Anyone that calls Khan a runner is about as bright as Khan himself.
     
  5. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest


    so is keep away=running?
     
  6. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest

    Please point me to exactly which bits are incorrect and why otherwise GTFO
     
  7. widdy

    widdy lancs,where real men live Full Member

    5,747
    0
    Aug 19, 2008
    :nono now thats not nice,im not bright,but brighter than khan,and i called him a runner:nono

    theres a massive difference in stepping back and/or moving your head and throwing shots to running backwards and covering up,:bartwatch and learn and you shall see young skywalker:worm
     
  8. SouthpawSlayer

    SouthpawSlayer Im coming for you Full Member

    16,351
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    give it up, your nuthuggerry of your fan boy is making you look dumb
     
  9. widdy

    widdy lancs,where real men live Full Member

    5,747
    0
    Aug 19, 2008
    if thou dus not know, thou never will:finger5
     
  10. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest

    :patsch

    I am not a fanatic of Khan. I am just expressing my point og view, and if you can't explain to me and refute my points without resorting to childish insults then Im not gona take you or your posts serious now GTFO
     
  11. Seriously, stick to Kell Brook threads and you'll be alright.
     
  12. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest

    ok then

    :patsch
     
  13. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest

    :deal
     
  14. SouthpawSlayer

    SouthpawSlayer Im coming for you Full Member

    16,351
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    your points were already answered by quite a few people and your points were deemed as poor, comparing khan to what srl done is baffling and the debate was over with, your digging your grave here just leave it get on with something else
     
  15. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest

    :huh

    So according to you if you even mention SRL in a debate about whether Khan was running or not but express how much better SRL is than Khan and will probably never be on the same level as SRL = an automatic debate loss, please explain to me this.

    And please explain to me where any of the points I made were actually addressed further than 'Khan is a runner, end of debate' 'you wrong Im right' type posts.