Yup, you heard it right. The Khan Nuthuggers have taken glass jaw denial to a NEW level!!! Oh jesus, now I've heard it all! Silly, unprovable assertions like "that punch woulda KOd anyone" were bad enough - now it's "THAT JAB WOULDA DROPPED ANYONE!":rofl:rofl
"The lad Prescott got beaten by got dropped with the jab Prescott used. Does that mean he also has a glass jaw?" Sounds completely different to... "That jab would have dropped anyone" Make yourself useful, Zakman. Pretend to be a speed bump or something.
What do YOU think the Khan nuthugger is trying to imply by saying that Prescott's jab dropped that other guy? patsch
How about posting the thread so we can read that comment in context. Because at the moment, it's not implying anything of the sort.
wow zakman how can u call khan glass jawed and then justify your support for zelenoff who was pwned by the worst active fighter in Arkansa in a round
theres so many idiots on this forum that seems to have a personal vandetta against professional fighters. If someone gets knocked out why should you hate him for it
I want your prediction for Khan-Maidana now? Because after the fight i don't want you saying 'Oh Maidana was over-rated. Moron.
Just found the original comment: To me, Lexar is simply saying: “Khan being wobbled by a Prescott jab is not that bad, because that same jab has managed to knock down a previous opponent.” Whether this point is valid or not, doesn’t matter. What matters is that Lexar is not saying..."that jab would have dropped anyone". It's you that is saying it.
You wanted it - here's the context. It's pretty clear what's being said here, wouldn't you agree?? www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=7884979&postcount=12
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl Defend your fellow glass jaw denier all you want, the comments speak for themselves. That is exactly what this joker is saying, and it's pretty damn obvious.:yep