After the Garcia fight, it became safety first, Collazo, Alexander and Algeri, yet Khan and his consistent delusional state would have you believe that each opponent are current world beaters.
Why? He was flooding them in here, who knows whether the same people khan helped to get into europe were not responsible?
http://www.boxingnewsresults.com/2015/khan-mayweather-was-scared-of-me/ Scott Gilfoid posts a decent article. For once.
Could have talked a good game over time if he goes on to dominate the division, finishes of Manny, avenge Garcia loss and beats brook (at Wembley in front of 80,000 people) ...he can claim may weather ducked him
You should be banned for this. He was actually a target for extremists after speaking out against them and advised against travelling to ****stan for security reasons.
No khan actually supported and funded a Islamic charity which had links to extremist groups. That's where his allegiances lie.
You thought an 5 star hotel in Nigeria was serving human heads on the menu despite there being no evidence whatsoever. You made a total fool of yourself. So, I have to question anything and everything that comes out of your ignorant mouth. This Marv character seems like a buffoon too. Grow up guys.
You expect me to fly to nigeria and check for myself that they were serving human heads? The reports are there and it's not unheard of from the african regions of getting chopped up for rituals and human consumption. Go camp out there at night and see you if come back with all your limbs As for this, the charity that khan gave 80,000 sterling pounds to DID have links to terror groups such as Al Qaeda, Hamas and Bin Laden himself. The only thing in kahn's favour is that he can play the ignorance card and pretend that he didn't know anything about it and his zealous fanboys will lap it up. But the cold hard truth is, that your boy is a terror funder, deal with it.
I'll repeat what I explained to you last time as you don't seem to have understood what I wrote. Try reading it slower and think hard about the words. "I think you've been taken in a bogus news story that sensationalist rags sought to splatter across the internet as click bait without caring about its accuracy. A bit like when the Sun ran a story claiming Eastern European's were killing and eating swans in the UK. Swan Bake was the headline. Firstly, the 'credible' news sources that picked it up, the independent, express etc. all cite the Osun Defender as their 'source' for this story which has no specific mention of the hotel in question's name or the names of anyone arrested. Do you not think this is fairly key information to include? Any quotes or a statement from the local police? Nope. The best they can come up with is a few lines supposedly given to them by a "vegetable seller" and a "local pastor" about shady looking people going in to this mysterious eatery. Again no names are given. Any follow up reports of these heinous individuals facing trial? That'd be a no too. Thus the human heads/meat being served in an African hotel restaurant story looks an obvious hoax." I'm hardly asking you to go to Nigeria, just come up with you know, a few basic facts on a case which you'd have no trouble obtaining if the story was genuine.