Khan: i fight tougher opposition in a better division than froch

Isn't it easier to say the obvious?

Khan is the much bigger CELEBRITY BOXER, his defeat overshadowed the media juggernaut of Haye-Chisora for crying out loud.

When Froch lost to Kessler and Ward, where was the double features in all the papers?

Froch is the better CV and will leave the sport with no questions asked.

BUT he will never ever be more FAMOUS than Khan due to his Olympic days and early ITV primetime fights.

Froch is clearly a bit bitter of a flawed fighter who will always be better known than him.

 

This is bull**** from Khan.... Froch has stated countless times he was misquoted. Eddie Hearn got involved & the BBC edited their piece on it.

Froch was talking as if it were him....

I.E where HE is in HIS career right now. If he got beat twice, by not stellar opinion he'd retire. Context people!

 

Think Khan has more than proven that he is willing to box anyone anywhere.

He has also shown somewhat recklessly that he'll have a scrap with just about anyone.

Anyone can pick holes in anything, but Khan has chased of bradley (who wanted nothing to do with him) as well as standing up to Maidana's bombshells. He has dismissed Judah and gave a boxing masterclass to Kotelnik, who lets not forget was robbed by Alexander.

Yes he has a weak chin, and often lacks discipline, but he's an exciting fighter who leaves it all in the ring, he's not happy fighting bums.

It just seems that many would like to see him fail, allegedly for no other reasons than he occasionally talks nonsense-well show me a fighter who doesn't ever run their mouth off.

 

Why do you keep banging on about being a 'bigger name' That's why so many people are fed up with his hype?