lol are you dumb. A south asian has never ever won a gold medal in boxing at the olympics or world championships ever, it's very embarassing not a single one despite having 30% of the worlds population. They send to full teams to the olympics and they all go out in the 1st round. they are completey crap in the amateurs. theres been loads of boxers in england like amar, ahmed, anwar, siddique, blah blah blah, and they never even get to domestic level they can't compete. theres only ever been 1 that has won a world title in the pros. They can't fight at all there is no excuses, do you want me to go on? the stats are extremely embarassing
interesting that you had to write 'gold', so as to cut out all the other medal distinctions they won. wonder why? anyways the rest of your post is BS, even Mary Kom whom I mentioned, a woman at that, has won the world title 3 times. And they tend not to go pro, its not seen as a done thing in india, but you can interpret this as being crap as pros if you wish even if theres few of them physically doing being professionals. Absence of body is not the same thing as presence of mind, something you might want to take on board. you should be running now.
who is talking about Womens boxing no one is talking about that I don't even follow that though I'm 100% sure if I looked into it the stats would also be really embarassing. Theres no excuses for the thousands upon thousands of pro south asians past and present who were failures in boxing, there is like a 99.99999% chance of failure rate. Its pretty embarassing when tiny populated nations like Wales and Ireland and Puerto Rico have on their own achieved more than the whole of south asia combined over 2 billion To be classed as even satisfactory in boxing you would have to have had 20 gold medalists at LEAST JUST TO BE CALLED SATISFACTORY YET YOU DONT EVEN HAVE 1. you'd have to have had at least 20 pro world champion just to be called satisfactory yet you have only had 1. It goes witHout saying that you are crap at boxing looking at the stats for the olympics mens boxing which you send full teams to every time. India population 1 . 4 billion only ever won 1 bronze medal ever ****stan population 180 million - only ever won 1 bronze medal ever Bangladesh - population 150 million - never ever won a medal in any sport ever and from around the world just the one off khan who won silver so 1 silver and 2 bronzes ever for your whole race if you think that is an achievement and that you are good at boxing THEN I GIVE UP
'' ****stani's can't fight'' ''the truth hurts and people don't like the truth'' angel garcia it really goes without saying anyway theres so many british ones that couldnt even get to british level that it was a well known saying in the UK long before garcia said it.
Khan has been #1 in the prestigious ESB Glass Jaw Rankings for several years now. So, yes he is the best ever at something. Too bad it isn't fighting though.
I agree that Khan is an extremely talented fighter Farmy..... Problem is he HAS the best defensive trainer in the BIZ.......he isnt being taught defense, but when he fights in that manner, he loses the one thing that got him where he is, and that's his speedy in and out style. Can Virgil focus on his strengths and still instill that discipline for him to succeed at the highest level.....IDK......doesnt appear so, but if he can reel off a couple midlevel wins, he may get his payday with Mayweather, and then he can go on a lifelong pilgrimage like Sultan and Naseem..... Seems to be what great Muslim fighters do when they can't achieve the pinnacle of the game.:think
his DNA is ****ed up he will go down in history as having the worst chin ever and as the best ever chicken dancer
khan being the best ever indian/****stani fighter ever is the equivalent of Junior Witter being the best ever black boxer and the rest of their top 10 is like the equivalents of Max Maxwell and Carl Baker
hopefully geeks like Tamwar Masood will disapear when Khan suffers his next embarassing KO loss and hangs up the gloves