Khan-Little fish in a big pond?

Hatton made the move because he wanted to be great more-so than he wanted cash. He already had more than enough money. This is something I personally believe in and something Hatton rarely gets credit for. Khan on the other hand, made the move for more money, opportunities and publicity.

 

How about the combination punching? Or footwork? Or boxing ability?

His success is down to more than speed.

 

go look at the combos he threw against garcia :rofl and his footwork

or the combos against peterson many others to mention also

go look at his footwork in the drilzane fight many others to mention to


they say two out of three aint bad but the reality is all he as is speed :rofl

nice try though

 

It wasn't just speed that beat Alexander or Collazo - it was effective combination punching, nifty footwork, judgment of distance, all round boxing skill.

Khan's speed is a great asset, but don't let it dazzle you into thinking that is his only attribute. He has many others.

 

Alexander and Collazo aren't great boxers. Collazo was way past his best, and was a recovering alcoholic. Alexander lost to Porter and Bradley, and got a gift against Kotelnik.

 

so where were theses other attributes before the fights you mention atsch

 

it's hard to stay humble when you've got a lot of haters, imo.

 

The Alexander victory was pretty impressive, it was clinic. Alexander is not ATG, but he is a decent boxer and no one has schooled him like Khan.

 

They were still evident, but his worst flaw (a dodgy chin) reared its head.

You said above that Khan's entire game is speed. My point is that he has more than speed.

 

yeah ok

shame khan did not think so

the switch to hunter :rofl

 

I hope so too. Sadly though for Froch, he didn't kick off his professional career with a medal to be as popular as Khan was early in his career. Froch, in my personal view, deserves all the hype, money and attention. The man is a warrior.