Khan and Alexander share a lot of similarities. Alexander is more physically durable, though. And Khan has more heart. No telling how 147 will suit him, so it's a difficult one to pick. But down at 140, where we know Khan is very effective, I'd pick him. He's at his best at long range.
Alexander starts slow Khan comes out fast Alexander looks crappy in first few rounds get's cut outworked Fails to set a pace and get into a rythm Easy slow decision for Khan maybe even TKO
Alexander did look bad in quitting against Bradley , people will harp on him for the next 10 years because of it. His resume is pretty ****ing good for a kid that just turned 25 last month..... if he can be more aggressive earlier in a fight, he will be a threat to anyone
Where the **** does Khan get off running his mouth about "smashing" anyone? He struggled and LOST-- that's right, Brittards, LOST-- to a B quality 140lber his last time out. This overhyped British chump needs to get a grip, and so do his nuthugger fans.
We heard all the same **** from you Brittards in the run-up to the Peterson fight. Remind me: how'd that work out?
Khan was just responding to Alexander - who tweeted something about kicking the **** out of Khan. Khan's within his right to reply the way he did.
Kind of like the ******s who were claiming prior to the LP fight that Khan would stand a chance of beating Floyd?? :rofl
No shame in losing to Peterson. He's a good, solid boxer. He was apparently very competitive when he sparred Mayweather Jr, and Roger Mayweather also admitted that he did well. Sparring is of course different to real fights, but Peterson is nothing to laugh at. He's only lost to Bradley. I'm surprised that he struggled against Ortiz, though.