Khan says NO to a Brook Fight SMH

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by El Chicano, Mar 28, 2015.


  1. jdw2000

    jdw2000 Active Member Full Member

    1,226
    39
    Oct 16, 2014
    Exactly. It's so obvious why Khan doesn't want the fight that it hardly needs a thread.
     
  2. StreetsOfGold

    StreetsOfGold Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,252
    1
    Nov 9, 2008
    still doesnt cancel out brooks 33 bums out of 34 fights
     
  3. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    he needs to fight Brook!!
     
  4. critix

    critix Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,619
    493
    Jul 9, 2012
    lol you just owned him

    the only fight where i give credit to brook is shawn porter other than that he is fought nothing but bums
     
  5. Beast-Mode

    Beast-Mode Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,584
    0
    Aug 28, 2014
    So what? Take his title and make a boatload of cash by fighting at Wimbley. Where is the negative in this?
     
  6. Rampage88

    Rampage88 Active Member Full Member

    694
    3
    Mar 25, 2014
    There isn't one. Some of his fans will defend him ducking fights just like Mayweather fans did when he didn't want to fight Manny, because he didn't want it his fans didn't want it and would give dozens of reasons why the biggest fight in history shouldn't happen.

    Even if Khan got offered Mayweather but didn't want to fight him, the same fans in this thread would defend him and try to find stupid excuses. If they were fans of the sport they'd want this fight but they're not. They've got their tongues so far up his **** they would be happy for him to never fight a top10 fighter ever again if he didn't want to, and they'd defend him like their lives depended on it.
     
  7. deltrotter

    deltrotter Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,659
    553
    Jun 8, 2013
    I hear that Khan asked for a winner take all fight lmao like he has anything to give pmsl
     
  8. StreetsOfGold

    StreetsOfGold Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,252
    1
    Nov 9, 2008
    The negative for khan is probably a low ball offer from brook and hearne.
    So in a sense Khan is right brook hasn't earned the right to claim A side agaisnt Khan.

    Don't be fooled by brook man remember this is the same guy that ducked Alexander way before the leg injury he pulled out twice.
    He's looking to cash in vs Khan and Khan is simply saying why should i give him a pay cheque.

    It reminds me of Hatton and Junior witter.