Khan v Mitchell: Let the war of words commence!

1. Haye
2. Froch
.
.
.
.
3. Khan

Then everyone else.

 

Now I know you are well and truly on the wind up.

Brook has beaten absolutely nobody

 

Neither's that list, which is in fact ****.

 

How can you have Khan a man who has one absolutely shite defense above a man who unified the division before stepping up a div and then winning a belt and defending it against decent oppo

Same applies to Froch. Pascal, Taylor, Dirrel and Kessler are leap years above Kotelnik

Brook above the rest on the list barring Groves is lunacy

Rhodes won the EBU last fight out. Munroe has had it for a while, defended it and won an Eliminator

Groves on that list at all is ridiculous

 

If im honest mate and i dont want to sound arrogant or dismissive , i think you need to look into the business side of boxing a little bit more before thinking that fighters (and this goes for any fighter in the world) put what the public might think before there pay check , and guess who's writing the paycheck ??? , Mr Promoter !!!!!

Khan is 23 , where was Hatton , Calzaghe & Haye when they were 23 ??? exactly , the kid has got years to get big fights under his belt , and it starts with Paulie getting KTFO !!!!

BTW i wasnt suggesting at all that you were racist , my post was a generalised post on Khan haters who hate the lad through the colour of his skin !!!!! and there are plenty of those :deal

 

:-patsch:twisted::bart:fireblood:|:shock::yikes

 

You have your own opinions fella's i have mine , i think we share different opinions of what P4P actually means , we can argue all night but the lists are out ....................

 

1. Haye
2. Khan
3. Froch
4. Mitchell
5. Munroe

 

Well how do you define P4P? Because by the looks of it you don't even look at a fighters record when you rank them and just focus on their ability.

 

Honest to **** , **** makes me laugh , people come on here and post there top 3 or 4 or in some cases 5 but nobody commits to posting 10 , this bear in mind is after others have posted there GB P4P list so they have a rough guide to go off without making themsleves look that stupid in there eyes !!!!!

A top 10 list goes up and bang its like ****in Blackpool illuminations with little laughing faces and **** 1 liners !!!!!!! , fella's ****in think for yourselves and have convictions in what you think is right not what Mr 20'000 posts thinks because he is the old sweat on these streets !!!!!

 

1.haye
2.hatton
3.froch
4.khan
5.mitchell

hatton is number 2 depending on what he is doin if hes retired then froch moves to number 2 and kell brook or munroe maybe enzo goes in from his past belts and what hes doin at the moment goes to number 5 imo

 

Thats exactly what i look at , P4P ability , who is the most well rounded fighter , who has the most tools , who all in all is the better fighter reguardless of who they have fought !!! , i dont neccesarily think the level of opposition is a yard stick to where somebody sits P4P , i think it plays a part , but i think some of you fella's use that as the only indication of where P4P a fighter should sit .

Oscar De La Hoya was ranked P4P #1 in the world in 1995 after just 22 fights , where the **** was he in 06 after KO'ing Mayorga and winning his 10th World Title ???

 

Haye
Froch
Hatton
Khan
Rhodes
Munroe
Cleverly
Mitchell
Booth
Murray

 

This is my POINT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Here's my top 20, pick it apart if you want:

1. David Haye
2. Carl Froch
3. Ricky Hatton
4. Amir Khan
5. Rendall Munroe
6. Ryan Rhodes
7. Matthew Macklin
8. Nathan Cleverly
9. Kevin Mitchell
10. Junior Witter
11. Kell Brook
12. Brian Magee
13. Paul McCloskey
14. Martin Lindsay
15. John Murray
16. Darren Barker
17. Jason Booth
18. Ola Afolabi
19. Sam Sexton
20. Jamie McDonnell/Matthew Hatton lol