I've said it'll take someone who can move in and out well to stifle Broner but I reckon he 'd work Khan out after 4-5 rounds. Floyd would play with him for 12 like an Orca with a seal cub.
This thread is quite embarrassing. And yes, I'm talking about the Broner fans. You guys are are an off-shoot of the *****s. We need to think of a name for you, because in the coming years you'll be making some ridiculous claims about your man.
Yet when no one supports rising fighters people cry "Boxing is on the verge of D E A T H!!!". Better annoying fans than nothing, that's what will eventually make you tune in to his fights.
I could make it really interesting and say that Ricky Burns was on Ringside talking about Broner tonight. But we'll keep that between us mate.
Broner fans? All you have to be is a fan of Boxing to see this! And for the record the "*****s" have been proven right! Khan fans can't come up with ANY logical reason why Khan wins this fight. Khan fans keep saying "a guy with movement", "who goes in and out", blah, blah, blah... while completely ignoring the fact that when Khan faced B level competition he ALWAYS is drawn into wars and in those wars has been stopped multiple times in DEVASTATING fashion. So which Khan are you evaluating? The Khan that is or the Khan that should have been?
****ing hell mate. How old are you? Why does everything have to be one group of fans against another. It's childish. I bet half the people voting for Khan aren't even big fans of his - rightly or wrongly they're just making a call on a fight. It seems as though all the kids who latched on to Mayweather have done the same thing to Broner and now we've got a bunch of Problem Children running amok on the website turning everything into a a slanging match.
I thought it was me who mentioned it would take someone who could move in and out well to get at Broner.
What? A bunch of childish idiots on a forum with an irrational idolisation with a boxer are going to make me tune into a fight? No.
While that may not be the one and only reason to tune in, you can't deny that hoping a certain fighter loses would make logging in to laugh out loud at his virtual crew that much more worth it. :deal
No logical reason? Erm, how about the fact that Broner has never faced anyone of Khan's style or size, and that he doesn't come in the mould of a fighter that Khan typically suffers against. The way you're laughing off those that are favouring Khan, is as if we're talking about Khan vs. Sugar ****ing Ray Leonard. It's just Broner, for crying out loud. Someone who should have lost against PDL and whose best win so far is just a DeMarco. He's a brilliant fighter but he's still untested. Jam the hype, man.