khan vs broner

Talk about strange...you claim he should have two losses on his record.

That's called Hateraid blindness
It comes right after denial.

De Leon was running like he was in the ring with a Grizzly bear and didn't land shi.t...

The only person setting the pace and landing the shots was Broner.

Quintero...what was that an 8 rounder....your hallucinations take you that far back?.....damn.

 

Broner is tash , flat footed , no ring iq, but I'd still favor him to shatter khans glass jaw.

 

You should re watch both fights, 2 loses for Broner. You are the one in denial my friend.

 

broner would kill khan

 

When De Leon does it, its called "running" but when Mayweather does it....its called " boxing" what gives?:huh

 

You haven't watched either fight.

 

Look who's asking...

One of Calzhage's hoes...

De Leon is usually a come foreward fighter....not against Broner...he was on his bicycle all night.

You'd think he was in the ring with a grizzy bear.

 

Is this a troll thread? Broner ain't even in Khan's league. Ask Malginaggi :deal

 

Khan would trash Broner and make him quit on his stool ! Broner's a protected cherrypicked hype whos careful matched against pillow fisted fighters with a good profile and an ABC trinket like Paulie.

 

atsch. Funny.

 

Hey bro, stop being butthurt LMFAO

 

Ask Malinaggi what?

Broner is wearing his title.

Khan was KTFO at 135 and every other weight division he's been in.
Broner has become a Champion in every division he's been in.

If anthing,Khan isnt in Broner's league.:deal

 

Broner has one notable win in his resume i.e DeMarco.

He clearly lost to Ponce de Leon and everybody knows that, even his shitty biased nuthuggers like mr pibb. :yep

They want to build the next PPV star (cuz Floyd will retire) in Broner by cherrypicking his opponents. Paulie was intentionally 'kept' with that title ( WBA) ....... for Broner.
People are asking why no other fighter didn't want to fight Paulie for his title ? And the answer is quite simple : Because they would've not allowed no dangerous fighter to fight him because that WBA ww title was 'destined' to Broner. Paulie was intentionally 'chosen' to have that title cuz he wasn't a dangerous fighter (pillow fisted) and he had a high profile. :yep

I wonder if that WBA title would've belonged to Alexander, Guerrero or even Khan , they still would've matched Broner with one of them ?! :think

And why Broner didn't choose to fight one of those dangerous fighters from 140 ? :think

When Broner will fight with Alexander, Garcia, Guerrero, Matthysse or even Khan then I'll give him big props. :good

 

Yeah ask Paulie how it felt to hand over his title and his chic to AB:rofl
:smoke

 

I agree with most your post cept this:huh:huh:huh