khan vs naz?

amir would beat a prime naz course he would, naz was tiny.. he is tiny.. khan would win end of story.. Take away naz's power and theres nothing left.. khans got more ability than Naz

 

You are to '****** statements' what henry armstrong was to 'punches'.

 

atsch

You have no clue.

 

:rofl :yep :good :thumbsup

 

hha shut up m8, soon as jeff says something you gotta lick his ass..

"oh if jeff says so it must be true......

i aint got no clue coz i think khan would beat naz.. barerra beat him, and hes too small.. khans probably a natrual lightwelter and naz is featherweight..

 

Er, I've never spoken to Jeff in my life. I have no clue who he is.

If I've quoted a post of his in the past and expressed my support, it's because the post is good, not the poster. I don't know about you, but when I read this forum I pay attention to the content of the posts rather than the name of the person posting them. Seems only logical.

Oh and notice that I didn't take issue with you saying Khan could beat Naz (although that's far from certain and could easily be debated) because I only quoted your other sentence:

'Take away naz's power and theres nothing left.. khans got more ability than Naz'

Utter bull, and you would know that if you've seen Naz's fights from early in his career.

 

I'm with Bailey tunes on this one. He is the fountain of all boxing knowledge. :smooch

 

Naz starches him early, obviously. I am one of Khan's bigger fans on here (and thats not saying much) but size has nothing to do with it. Willie Limond isn't a real lightweight, superfeather/feather at best. Naz was still a terrific puncher, even at featherweight, so do the math...

His awkward punches would also be poison for Khan. His defence looked okay against 2 orthodox guys in Kristjansen/St Clair, but they punched straight, when faced with the awkward angles of Naz he would quickly unravel :yep