Prescott was still undefeated and only fought vasquez in summer, khan had from september 2008-to july of 2009 to avenge that defeat but instead he ducked dodged and concealed himself from the Man that murked him in 50 seconds:yep and now he's saying Bradley has no balls, mother****er bradley fought the undesputed lightweight champ in 2009 fought kendell holt and lamont peterson in the same year, the guys recently had promotional problems which kept him back from making the khan fight. Bradleys still number 1 at 140 not khan
Power is the only thing that has given Khan trouble, I don't see where Bradley fits into this equation.
People can talk about prescott losses but the avenging rematch for khan could have happened anytime, khan choose not to do it and let prescott fade away. Its not that bad since he is on a higher level than prescott and got a titleshot shortly after losing to him. Khan could have avenged his loss but made the decision to not take the risk, it wont hurt him that much legacywise but it would have been nice to see the rematch.
Someones lips are locked tight on Timid tim's bell end. Bradley would rather be stripped of titles than fight Khan. Fact.
Khan >>> Prescott McCloskey >>> Prescott Khan >>> McCloskey Peterson >>>Prescott Prescott is a bum who fails to pace himself. Not even worthy of fighting Khan Prescott Khan is 2008 news, Khan looks completely different and fights so much better. I guess all the guys who beat pacquiao pre 2005 are worthy of fighting him? bahaha
STFU. No one gives a **** why he turned down the biggest fight, the biggest pay day of his career....people cant lose or even duck these days because of *** excuses like you just said.....bottom line is This content is protected :hi: