Kid Gavilan vs Sugar Ray Leonard

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by James9753, Oct 12, 2018.


  1. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,392
    3,793
    Jun 28, 2009
    That said I take absolutely no issue with anyone picking Leonard.
     
  2. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,062
    6,277
    Jan 22, 2009
    Gavilan was superb, but I believe Lenny just a hair better and would demonstrate it against the Kid.
     
  3. No_name_tard

    No_name_tard Active Member Full Member

    508
    420
    Nov 13, 2023
    Leonard wasn't that effective when he had to press and lead the action, especially against elite opposition. I think he would probably take duties as the outboxer in this one, where he was more successful. Good analysis of his defense. He was clearly capable but never truly looked like a slick boxer in there. Perhaps it's down to defensive responsibility and awareness than ability.
     
  4. jabber74

    jabber74 Active Member Full Member

    944
    1,001
    Oct 5, 2012
    Gavilan was extremely durable and one of the few fighters never to have been stopped. He was a competitor who could fight anybody but I have to go with Leonard for sure in this matchup.

    Leonard had a better boxing brain and could think and adapt better. He had more to offer overrall.

    Gavilan struggled against Billy Graham who was really a stand up straight boxer, much slower than SRL. There were guys that beat Gavilan. Danny "Bang Bang" Womber was a big underdog and beat Gavilan. If he could do it, then so could Leonard.