Kimbo Slice Vs. Seth Petruzelli - FULL FIGHT -

Rampage said that?

 

You're an idiot, he threw that exact same punch on a psi machine and it was incredibly high. rampage's shot knocks anybody in the world down.

You can see his hips turn and his left leg flex, it had alot on it, it was a hard punch, this is a stupid argument.

 

:rofl

:rofl
This china chin is goin g to knockout Wlad said his promoter.:rofl Wlad KO one minute give or take 59 seconds. That goes for Peter also.

 

Never said anything about being harder than those punchers, but anybody can clearly see Rampage threw a full power punch with alot on it.

 

Which argument will waste more boarders' time? This one or the one about whether or not Shogun Rua fell incorrectly on his arm? :nut

 

I don't want to jump in your insulting match but consider the terrain that a sporting event happens in and the evolution of most the other martial arts your putting down. I would say MMA has proven what works in a ring with strictly enforced rules. Those rules automatically preclude some of the nastier moves practiced by other styles (pressure point kind of things that only has a purpose to injure). Also most other styles are based on the assumption that your opponent could have a weapon and how to deal with that.

Now I love MMA but I see it for what it is and that is a sport, when you get into comparisons either way you are confusing two closely related things that may have a common root with things you can make equal comparisons on.

 

Get serious; if you have to rely on pressure point attacks, which are legal in mma, you are not a fighter.

If you have to rely on "illegall deadly" techniques, you are going to get beat every time.

There have been and still are (Rio heros) Brazilian vale tudo fights where EVERYTHING is legal, and modern mma guys and old school BJJ/MMA/Lute Livre/judo/wrestling guys dominated.

Under any set of rules, the styles that are considered good for MMA are ALWAYS going to beat any "too deadly for competition" kung fu bull****.

 

Some dumb punks 1st law of forums
If you post it, you will be misunderstood.



I am not saying that any of those styles would work in MMA or that one is better than the other, all I am saying is that they were designed to work in different situations. Its like comparing boxing and kickboxing or MMA, they work best in the environment they are ment for. Also I was not digging at your argument any more than that guys instructor for comparing things that shouldn't.

 

What kind of situations?

 

What I'm saying is, those situations, with the exceptions of weapons, don't really exist. There are next to no fighting situations in which vale tudo style training wouldn't be optimal.

 

Not true.