Kirkland takes Mayweather 12 rounds.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PJ, May 19, 2015.


  1. Real-G

    Real-G Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,727
    8
    May 18, 2013
    Looks like you need to find another sport to watch!! If your Hero can not adapt to different styles and needs one particular style to deal with, then his/her whole career is a sham!

    Duran was a fighter who could cut off the movers and out box the boxers! When he failed to crack the code for the Ray Rematch, he knew he had lost! Not because Ray didn't stand in front of him and slug but because he failed to prepare for Ray's movement. SO HE QUIT!

    Some fighter rather then Quit rather make excuses for their short coming! They like the blame the winner for wining or make excuses of why they fell short!!
     
  2. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,237
    13
    Dec 11, 2012
    You're easily the biggest clown on here. You don't know a damn thing about the sport. You just go around spewing a bunch of non sense. It wouldn't surprise me if you don't even watch boxing but rather come on here just to get attention.
     
  3. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    Yes, it most likely goes the distance with Mayweather winning by UD.
     
  4. zulander

    zulander Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,042
    1,724
    Mar 17, 2006
    Kirkland who got sparked by Isida or batterd by Canelo

    Floyd has so much more skill I wouldn't mind betting he could do a hatton on Kirkland and walk him into something Kirkland's china chops cant hold
     
  5. Bustajay

    Bustajay Feel the Steel/Balls Deep Full Member

    33,763
    14,023
    Dec 9, 2012
    Kirkland has lost the basic skills and foundation of boxing. His timing is all off and he would look silly in there with Floyd. Plus, who would watch this on PPV?
     
  6. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    How was Maidana able to do it? Kirkland is bigger, more wild and relentless. Kirkland would eat Floyd's punches and chase him down with unpredictable looping hooks that Floyd wouldn't be able to stay away from. Kirkland is chinny and not particularly skilled but his style is all wrong for Floyd, if Floyd couldn't knock him out (and I don't think he could) then Kirkland wins. For another example of how poorly Floyd does against unorthodox fighters look at the Augustus fight, or when old Cotto was having success on the ropes.
     
  7. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,337
    641
    Jun 16, 2006
    PAC does not have the ***** too fight big punchers.
     
  8. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,752
    3,947
    Jun 13, 2012
    Kirkland is a face-first slugger. There's no way he could beat Floyd.
     
  9. ecdrm15

    ecdrm15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,286
    108
    Apr 30, 2008
    Kirkland losses every round though.
     
  10. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,237
    13
    Dec 11, 2012
    Maidana is a much better fighter than Kirkland, and he lost twice to Floyd. It's hard to say if he was able to trap Floyd or if Floyd just decided to fight off the ropes. Because he said the rematch would be much different and Maidana was not able to get him against the ropes in the rematch.

    This must be a joke. This fight has zero chance of ever happening, so I guess you can hold onto this delusion.


    Augustus lost every round and was stopped. Sure he pushed Floyd pretty hard, but he's also more skilled than Kirkland and he lost decidedly. Did you really bring up Cotto? Old Cotto was less than a year older than Kirkland is now when Cotto fought Mayweather. He's also way more talented than Kirkland, and he lost at least 8 rounds against Floyd. People don't seem to learn on this forum. It's very similar to people claiming Pacquiao would beat Mayweather based on Mayweather's performances against other lefties, even though Mayweather won all of those fights decisively.