**** Kirk's ESB Championships 2011 ****

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kirk, Dec 29, 2010.


  1. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    There are rules in play though, which we have always adhered to. It says so right under the fight list: 7 days to add on a fight. This fight was added only 4 days before, which is breaking the rule. That's the bottom line, as I see it.

    It also doesn't help that it was missing from the fight list itself.
     
  2. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    Kirk, we need a fair ruling here.

    I'm taking this **** to the supreme court of the Kirk's prediction league! :smoke:
     
  3. jordan1

    jordan1 Juan Lopez #1 Full Member

    11,491
    30
    Jun 20, 2009
    It looks like axe was about the only person that did not see it because everyone else seen it check the picks, maybe in the future when you add fights on someone can call AXE on the phone and let him know theirs an add on.

    MAJORITY RULES.
     
  4. Tackleberry

    Tackleberry The Reverse Somersault! Full Member

    8,642
    2
    Dec 8, 2009
    ORDER OOOOORDER!!!
    This content is protected


    What say the jury?

    This content is protected


    GUILTY!!
     
  5. jordan1

    jordan1 Juan Lopez #1 Full Member

    11,491
    30
    Jun 20, 2009

    I had it happen to me here the day before the fight I did not cry about it and your the only one that did not pick the fight and I do under stand its going to knock you down the list but you have to rember you win some and you lose some thats just part of life Again this is not the first time SIR KIRK has added fights after the fight list.
     
  6. jordan1

    jordan1 Juan Lopez #1 Full Member

    11,491
    30
    Jun 20, 2009
    AXE if you would spend alittle more time on this site you would see the add ons look at the date above this gave us all ample enough time.:good Like it says ifff youuu want to suggest a fight to be added it needs to be suggested 7 days in advance THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WHEN KIRK POSTS IT HE COULD POST IT THE DAY OF THE FIGHT IF HE WANTS SOOO CASE IS CLOSED AND IT STANDS WHEN YOU READ DONT READ BETWEEN THE LINES AGAIN MAJORITY WINS NICE TRY THOUGH.
     
  7. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,423
    1,681
    Nov 20, 2007
    To be fair and impartial I say we should count the Syllakh fight and discount the Broner one, same with the bets. :deal
     
  8. jordan1

    jordan1 Juan Lopez #1 Full Member

    11,491
    30
    Jun 20, 2009
    Big Bone why do that nothing was done wrong because one guy who is on top of the board loses and going to get knock down a couple spots is a sore loser thats not fair how about the guy trying to move up the ladder
    Their is no 7 day rule he is full of **** thats not what it says Im not giving up my wins.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,012
    20,614
    Sep 15, 2009
    i actually agree with jordan, the rule is about suggestions, kirk did officially add it so it counts.

    however this jordan guy is coming off as a complete tosser and i wish he was wrong :-(
     
  10. jordan1

    jordan1 Juan Lopez #1 Full Member

    11,491
    30
    Jun 20, 2009
    Im comming on like a complete tosser for what is fair this is for fun but it is a contest right is right I am the last one to complain but lets play fair.:good
     
  11. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    70,548
    26,652
    Jul 26, 2004
    :lol: :lol:

    Ok..... well.

    Axe brings up some very good points, mainly, when I added the fights to be picked on, while I added them up top, I did indeed forgot to put it in the actual fight list.
    SO

    I think the right thing to do is to not count the fight. 99% of everyone picked Syl to win the fight so it doesnt effect anything much.

    I understand both sides here, and I can see both points of view, however, ultimately, this is my bad, I need to remember to put the fights down under even when I add them up top.

    I am, however, counting the Broner/Ponce fight, that was on the main list.

    So I apologise for the inconvenience, and I will be keeping it in mind when adding fights in the future :good
     
  12. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,423
    1,681
    Nov 20, 2007
    You guys don't understand. We have to discount the Broner fight because I got that wrong! It's only fair!

    We DEFINITELY count the Syllakh fight. NO WAY we discount that! :deal :bbb :hi:
     
  13. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    70,548
    26,652
    Jul 26, 2004
    Bottom line is if someone is checking the fight list real quick, and goes through it, they wouldnt see that fight listed. To me, that is the issue. Although I think the addition up top is sufficient, I suppose it could be easily skipped if someone is just scrolling through and then going right to looking at the fights in the list.

    The 7 day thing isnt an issue to me, its more of a guideline I like to follow for some peoples benefit who dont check the thread as much.

    But to me, I didnt add the fight to the main list down below for some reason, and so Axe does have a point I think :think
     
  14. Badlok

    Badlok Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,616
    0
    Nov 15, 2008
    100% agree!:deal
     
  15. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    70,548
    26,652
    Jul 26, 2004
    :lol: How bout I give everyone who picked Syl to win $20 compensation for their pick not counting.... :lol: