I like how you so conveniently edited out my bet proposal. Ok, it's fine I'll do Roman for 50 you do Zappavigna for 100. Fair enough. :good
That's never stopped you before. You had a bet with Acosta and Rios. Alright, how about this. I take Roman for 25, 25 for Dzinziruk. So, I got two underdogs, and I get two favorites in Cotto and Foreman for 25 each. And just to have an odd number of fights I'll take Burns for 25. There we go that sounds like a good deal. :good
Man, make up ur mind. If you wanna bet on Dzinziruk, I'm right here. You also see the bets I'm looking for and my picks, so you know who I'm looking for! :thumbsup
Nah, you are taking all of the fighters I wanna take. So, if we can't make a compromise looks like we have no deal.
Forget the Big Chicken. I'll make a deal with you: You take Roman for 25 You take Dzinziruk for 25 You take Foreman for 25 You take Vazquez for 25
U scared or what? Let Dan take your deal, and see if you take mine! Unless you're... This content is protected
Well that true, but where the Bet I made to Dan is FAIR, the one you made isn't. Saying no to that one would not make me a chicken but just clever:deal How about this then: You take 20$ on Vazquez I take 20$ on either Cotto/Martinez/Foreman/Barros.
Why would I go against my own bets? atsch You offered to take Wolak, and I say if you do I'm ready to compensate you with Vazquez out of fairness. Take it or chicken out with some excuse. :deal