Klit fans should the Charr fight had been stopped?

That's the point brittards dont understand. :deal

 

That's the point brittards dont understand. :deal

 

That's the point brittards dont understand. :deal

 

not his life, but he could end up like brewster

 

Oh so now we stop fights if something is likely to be an issue instead of it actually being an issue? In that case why even bother havin a fight in the first place, after all, being punched in the head is likely to be an issue. He got cut with an injury we see fixed up frequently but cut men.

Charrr was given absolutely no chance to deal with the cut, or respond. If Vitali was stopped so quickly for the same cut and lost his titles then you weird ****ers would have a complete meltdown. No doubt about it.

You don't stop a fight for a cut because a fighter isn't doing much, because he's ****, because he's up on the cards, because he's down on the cards or because there's a long time left - you stop it due to the severity of the cut. Charr's cut wasn't awful and for some reason his corner wasn't given the chance to fix it and he wasn't given the chance to respond - in a fight for a HW title.

 

you compare charr with hagler or vitali? :nut
you're getting senile old woman and you a sadistic person:deal

 

vitali would never lose all 4 rounds and getting kd, you dumb brittard.

 

I have to love the double standards here - hilariously exposing these creepy Klitschko obsessives for the non-boxing fans they are.

For years they've been crying about Vitali being stopped against Lewis despite being given every opportunity to fix the multiple cuts which left his face hanging off and have a go at ending the fight. But now, all of a sudden Vitali fights a guy with a far less severe cut who wasn't given any chance to fix it or respond and they're justifying the stoppage as if Charr's head was about fall off.

:rofl brilliant

 

Not a good stoppage, Vitali's stoppage against Lewis was better. Doctor is a *****.
Rematch for Charr? Not really what boxing fans want, only Charr fans and Vitali haters want this, while everyone wanted to see Vitali and Lewis rematch.

 

**** a rematch. This fight never should have happened in the first place.

 

Youre the best example for a brittard that understand nothing.

We dont cry about the spoppage, or how your trollfriends call it TKO6, we were sad bacause of the cut happened, because he was ahead on all cards and giving Lewis a real fight. a close fight, the biggest hw fight since years, a fight that would had a rematch.

But what is now, Bum eat bombs from vitali, gets floored in the 2nd, is loosing all rounds and gets cut in the fourth, the ref stops the fight, we have a TKO4, whats the problem.

But be careful, dont throw stones out of a glasshouse, the brittards do have an double standard:deal

 

I have squeezed out shits which contained more boxing knowledge than your entire being. Be quiet.

 

You should better learn to read little boy.

I compare the fights how they go not the fighters.

To get a cut is normal in boxing, a bad cut too.

Vitali was cut in the 3rd round, Hagler in the second.

In a worlchampionship fight the opponent who was cut, should get 1, 2 rounds more to watch how the fight will go.

Charr had his best moments after he was cut. So nothing wrong to give him 1 or 2 rounds more.

Vitali´s health was in danger after round 6 against Lennox Lewis and you are the one who write, the stoppage was not legal. Think about it. Your boy Vitali would have lost his eye.

Charr´s eye was not in danger after round 4.

 

Welcome to Klittardland:


Bad stoppage that requires nearly 10 years of moaning-

This content is protected

Good stoppage:

This content is protected

 

Don't try and reason with him and make him see sense. Waste of time. It's like trying to talk about Wlad objectively with you . . .

:hey