Klitite Quote of the day!!!!!!!

He is WALDOS best win yes - and he wasn't even considered as a challenge by Lewis. Lennox had more respect than to make people pay to see him blow out Byrd, and WALDO saw fit to fight him twice :roll:

 

Lewis beat every live dog in his time and done it well besides vitali but he ****ed him up quiet bad.

Wald has beat every old dog and alot of no name contenders

 

You really are insecure, deep down, aren't you. All your brohaha and all.
What's your deal?
Ok, go in the attack mode again.

 

It's KLIT-ite...the hyphen is all important.


My name is Suge Green and I approve this message. :good

 

Way to take a post out of context. Pathetic.

 

"BTW, he considers LL's resume to be no better than Wlads, I can quote him on that".

Just tell me this isn't true.

 

Was this part true...???

:huh

 

That's too funny.

Not bad for a noob...

 

Simultaneously, eh? :yep

....and pretty soon noob of the year. :hey

 

Whether he doesn't understand what direction that I have been on since day one with Wlad vs Lewis debates, I have stated over and over that there is no point in looking at Lewis' entire career, as he is retired now, and has a completed body of work to look back on. Just understand that EVERY time that I make a comment regarding Lewis and Wlad, it is basing Lewis and Wlad, at their same points of their career. So.. Wlad being 32 years old... I think that it's pretty simple to understand.

However, I have said it before... and I will say it again. Lewis' entire resume is overrated as hell. He didn't fight any of the top 5 best fighters of his era during their primes. Tyson, Holyfield, Bowe, Foreman, or Moorer. They all fought each other, and beat each other out of their primes as he didn't fight a single one. Then... he beats an over the hill Holyfield in a very close fight the second time around to actually become considered "the true champ" for the first time in his career. He then has a VERY short and unimpressive reign as Champ during the transitional period between his era, and the next era. At which his only defenses as "true champ" were Michael Grant, Frans Botha, and Tua... then was knocked out by Rahman ending that run... then winning back his titles only to beat an extemely over the hill Tyson, escaping a fight he was losing against Vitali by way of grazing punch causing a cut... and then retires when ordered to rematch Vitali. Tell me... what the hell was so impressive about that reign as Champ? It just boggles my mind. The man had great talent obviously... but he sure as hell wasn't more impressive by the age of 32 than Wlad is now... and his "reign of terror" as Champ really wasn't something to put at the top of history books.

 

Sry for being lazy, I'm not gonna give you a deep response right now. I will discuss it with you, though, some other time if you like.

Just a small remark, you just said Holy, Bowe, Moorer, Tyson and Foreman all fought each other and beat each other out of their primes. This is clearly false and I think I don't have to explain why, it's pretty obvious. Bowe relentlessly ducked Lewis, there is proof that Tyson ducked him too (in '98 I think), there's no way Lewis could have fought a prime Foreman, and imo he would obliterate Moorer had they fought.

So it all comes down to Holy. I'm not certain right now, but I don't know for sure that it was Lennox's fault that those two didn't fight earlier. Btw, Holy wasn't so over the hill as some want to present it. The 2002 Tyson sure was.

 

Shoulda, coulda, and woulda... Lennox really has those in spades.

People say that Tyson ducked Lewis... Tyson had a more lucrative fight on his hands and payed Lewis step aside money. You can't blame Tyson for that... However, Lewis DID NOT have to accept the money. People never want to mention that little tid bit. Lewis could have simply forced Mike's hand, but he took the money.

No matter which way you cut it... you have Lewis in the middle of his own era, with some other now legendary figures... and he managed to not fight a single one of them in their primes (Yes, Foreman wasn't in his physical prime, but he was a smarter fighter by then, and did win the title). It's amazing if you think about it.

 

They only "woulda" I mentioned was a potential fight with Moorer. What do you think about that?

Oh, I see. So maybe this means Lewis ducked Tyson? You know, by taking the money without having to face him eh? Doesn't matter that Lewis sued Tyson in order to fight him. Oh wait

Double standards here mate. You say "he managed to not fight a single one of them in their primes" without considering whose "fault" it was that he didn't. By that logic, I could say "Wlad didn't manage to avenge his losses to Sanders and Purrity", without considering the fact that it wasn't actually his fault that he didn't rematch them.

Look I like Wlad, I really do. But trying to smear the record of a guy like Lewis doesn't serve a purpose, other than proving you just don't like the guy.

 

Everyone already does say that about Wlad not avenging all of his losses... and I thought that you did on a different thread? Might have been someone else, it's hard to keep track. Anyways... whenever you find the time to discuss my previous post, like you have found the time to dicuss everything else, I'm all ears. Right now, I am going to bed.

 

It must have been someone else. I believe it is ridiculous for one to say that Wlad hasn't avenged his losses, like it's his own fault. As it's ridiculous what you said about Lewis not fighting those guys in their prime, for the reasons I already mentioned. I really like Wlad and I don't have a reason to lie about anything here. If my word doesn't "convince" you about it, too bad.

As you see it doesn't take much time to answer you. For the other post I have to do a little thinking/searching. I'd appreciate it if you didn't have an "attitude". I'm not avoiding stuff. I will get back to you.

Peace.