Klitschko clinches!

:good

 

:good:good:deal
THANK YOU. Perfect explanation & EXACTLY what we trained:thumbsup

 

Thats totally illegal. And he was punching with both hands. Lunging in like Superman.

Pacman got a stern warning when he did that by accident against Clottely.

Wlad can do whatever the hell he wants to in there and no ref will ever say anything to him.

 

Trained to cheat?. Can't say im surprised as i knew that all along.

Who came up with the strategy to cheat Povetkin out of any hope of any success :think

 

He immediately went out and clinched at the opening bell in that fight

 

The video clearly shows Wlad leading with clinches . Pulev was just stood there when he got knocked out.
What part of the picture evidence i posted couldn't you understand?

 

its not cheating you idiot. He didn't double punch

You are pathetic..... you rant and rave about X fighter will beat wlad... wlad beats that fighter and then like clock work you come back with "well fighter X was a bum"... or... "wlad cheated".."ref cheated"... "The judges cheated"...

GIVE IT A REST ALREADY

 

ohh SH!T, i agree with some of the stuff you say about trip G but thats IT not a single other thing do i remotely agree with you

 

I didn't expect Pulev would just stand in Wlads range with his hands down. He was meant to use movement. And i didn't like how Wlad couldn't out box a guy like that cleanly.

I could go back and get all the exact times when he double punched but i don't want to watch it again. Here's a pic.

http://cdn2-www.ringtv.craveonline....oto-by-joern-pollex_bongarts-getty-images.jpg

 

sorry, i didnt view the video. i thought you meant wlad held in that fight too much as a whole. when i watched it, twice, i remember pulev initiating most of the clich and wrestling.

now you have me interested in the video. i'll review and update accordingly

shoot, you attached the whole fight. not watching again. two huge HW's like that are going to clinch and wrestle a lot. i dont know what point you're trying to make.

are you saying wlad ruined the match ?
wlad usually lunges in for clinches after he punches, it removes the chances of getting countered. you should know wlads tendacy's by now.

wlad fought the perfect fight for that specific opponent. i agree he clinches in most fights too much. its his defense against faster fighters

 

he didnt double punch, he used that as a defense from pulev who made is uglier than it could have been. pulev kept one hand in wlads face all night, he used his arms as defense.

its hard to box cleanly between 2 huge sHW's. wlad outfought him

 

Klitschko is a very interesting fighter. There's no denying he's had a stranglehold on the HW division for a decade now, but his level of competition for a supposed ATG is absolutely atrocious. It's not his fault he's fighting in one of the most diluted versions of the HW division in the history of the sport, but it does take some of his hype away when dissecting his resume and recognizing his best win was against Sam Peter.

I don't rate him that highly P4P. The idea of p4p is to make guys the same weight in hypothetical matchups and speculate how they'd do against one another. He's so dominant because he's just so much bigger than his competition. He's taking on guys that are much shorter and have 20 plus pounds disadvantage in the ring on fight night.

HIs skillset is not impressive by any means.When I think of P4P fighters, I think of Mayweather, ward, chocolatito, rigo. Those guys have skillsets that make them the P4P stalwarts that they are. Now picture a smaller version of Wladimir, I just don't think his style would be dominant if he fought guys that were the same size as him who actually have a good skillset. Lennox would've given him a beating for the ages.

 

I stopped reading your **** when you said peter was his best win on his Resume... at that point YDKSAB:hi: and your opinion is moot.

 

Klitchko does indeed clinch too much but not in the Pulev fight

 

Ok, well first off if you want to insult me, be a little more original than that repetitively tedious comment that every idiot makes in these boards. That brings nothing to the table aside from you looking like an infant who can't think on his own.

So Who would you say his biggest win is against than?Povetkin? Haye? Enlighten me mr aficionado.

You can pick anybody out of his 60 plus fights, but the one universal and absolute statement I can make is he doesn't hold even a single victory against a HOF fighter. He hasn't even fought a single HOF'er in his professional career. For the most part, he's taken on tomato cans and anyone with a neutral position on assessing his resume would echo that sentiment. Once again, it's not his fault, he can only take on the guys that are available.

No doubt wladimir has been dominant in the past decade, but I can think of at least 5 or 6 other HW's that would easily have gone undefeated if they fought wladimir's Weak competition. And we all know he's lost to some inferior fighters that true HW ATG's would have zero problems dispatching.