Klitschko Dominance - In Numbers

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BoxingDomain, Jul 8, 2011.


  1. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,649
    4,162
    Feb 20, 2008

    :lol::-(

    You think Don Jose Suliaman would dare let Wlad fight for the vacant WBC belt while holding all those other belts? Are you new to Boxing? :patsch Have you not followed the WBC and their decisions over the years? If Vitali retires after Adamek it will be Arreola (who Suliaman wants to literally hand the belt to so he can be the first Mexican Heavyweight Champion) vs that Stiverne clown. Wlad could however fight the winner.

    And :rofl:patsch at calling Wlad a paper Champion when he holds the Ring Belt just because he may/could fight for a vacant belt. :lol::rofl:patsch

    You might want to pick another sport to follow. May I suggest Volleyball or Ice Skating.
     
  2. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    The Klitschkos have historical numbers.

    Wlad alone already has historical numbers.

    Vitali not so much, but he's great H2H.
     
  3. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    It's less likely.

    It's not harder. (i.e. they're still two people).
     
  4. BoxingDomain

    BoxingDomain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,701
    17
    Nov 21, 2008
    Not out of depth at all....and it goes towards credibility. You change your story to whatever fits you best, whether it's the truth or not. Just as you did above by picking Haye to win, and then after the fight saying you never picked Haye. :D
     
  5. BoxingDomain

    BoxingDomain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,701
    17
    Nov 21, 2008
    less likely = harder.

    I know you don't want to admit so...but THERE'S A REASON IT'S LESS LIKELY...BECAUSE IT'S HARDER TO ACCOMPLISH!
     
  6. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    May I suggest you pick the sweetcorn out of my ****?

    Sarcasm is obviously lost on you.
     
  7. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    :patsch

    When your father ****ed your mother, it was "likely" their offspring woud be ******ed.

    It wasn't hard.
     
  8. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,649
    4,162
    Feb 20, 2008

    Location: Essex UK

    I didn't notice this had I noticed I would not have even responded to you. :lol::rofl:patsch

    Why don't you go find another Glass Jawed British fighter to hype up or something? :lol::lol::lol:
     
  9. BoxingDomain

    BoxingDomain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,701
    17
    Nov 21, 2008
    Everyone see the above post?

    This is what people resort to when they are in an argument they know they can't win. Childish behavior.
     
  10. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    Well done to you. Feel free to waste your time on other **** nobody cares about.
     
  11. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    Ok. You obviously didn't get that simile.

    Let me explain it to you, dimwit.

    Just because something is less likely to happen, it doesn't mean the act of achieving it is harder.

    Understand?:patsch

    Of course, trying to trip me up on an entirely unrelated issue isn't childish, is it now?
     
  12. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    Then look harder next time, ****wit.

    Stick to your word and don't bother to comment on my posts. The world will be better off without your particular brand of ****.
     
  13. MaliBua

    MaliBua Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,869
    348
    Jun 20, 2010
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABZu5v2JPuE[/ame]