:-( You think Don Jose Suliaman would dare let Wlad fight for the vacant WBC belt while holding all those other belts? Are you new to Boxing? atsch Have you not followed the WBC and their decisions over the years? If Vitali retires after Adamek it will be Arreola (who Suliaman wants to literally hand the belt to so he can be the first Mexican Heavyweight Champion) vs that Stiverne clown. Wlad could however fight the winner. And :roflatsch at calling Wlad a paper Champion when he holds the Ring Belt just because he may/could fight for a vacant belt. :roflatsch You might want to pick another sport to follow. May I suggest Volleyball or Ice Skating.
The Klitschkos have historical numbers. Wlad alone already has historical numbers. Vitali not so much, but he's great H2H.
Not out of depth at all....and it goes towards credibility. You change your story to whatever fits you best, whether it's the truth or not. Just as you did above by picking Haye to win, and then after the fight saying you never picked Haye.
less likely = harder. I know you don't want to admit so...but THERE'S A REASON IT'S LESS LIKELY...BECAUSE IT'S HARDER TO ACCOMPLISH!
atsch When your father ****ed your mother, it was "likely" their offspring woud be ******ed. It wasn't hard.
Location: Essex UK I didn't notice this had I noticed I would not have even responded to you. :roflatsch Why don't you go find another Glass Jawed British fighter to hype up or something?
Everyone see the above post? This is what people resort to when they are in an argument they know they can't win. Childish behavior.
Ok. You obviously didn't get that simile. Let me explain it to you, dimwit. Just because something is less likely to happen, it doesn't mean the act of achieving it is harder. Understand?atsch Of course, trying to trip me up on an entirely unrelated issue isn't childish, is it now?
Then look harder next time, ****wit. Stick to your word and don't bother to comment on my posts. The world will be better off without your particular brand of ****.