Klitschko fan, quote of the week!!

Against McCall Lewis wasn't "out" like he was against Rahman.

Why couldn't Rahman find that punch against Wladimir? Power is the last trait to go in most fighters you know.

 

Once again you only show one side of the facts, you forget to mention the plethora of threads claiming that Haye is an ATG, he can beat Ali, and that he should be ranked #3 P4P.:nut Hell even Haye put himself as #5 in P4P, over the likes of Hopkins and Wlliams, when has either of the brother done that atsch. Dam hypocrites.:yep

 

Hell yeah I'll be there, it's gonna be a packed gymnasium. Haye is ducking Zelenoff.

 

Sanders throws very fast, powerful & STRAIGHT punches from a southpaw stance. Especially early. Sanders isn't sloppy in his power punches at all.

 

:iak:iak:iak

 

Game, set, match. Well done!

 

well thats stupid, im a haye fan but im not a haye fanatic. i sure as hell dont think that, and i sure as hell dont have either klitschko at top 5 either. top 30 top 20 at the most.

 

Kevin McBride! :rofl

Almost forgot that gem. Tyson resorted to trying to bite Kevin's nipples.................... :rofl

 

I accept your surrender...

 

All those losses are legit, regardless of the manner in which the fights were lost. That's the thing about boxing, it's a very unforgiving sport. Part of the reason I like it so much I suppose.

 

no, not at all. his punches have wide arch and no fluidity. he forces his punches, it just doesn't come natural to him. when corrie fights, he looks desperate, as if he has so much too lose. when corrie stumbled vitali, its not a punch that he knew would connect. it was a lucky shot, and i think he was more suprised that it landed more then vitali did. and comparing him tyson, there is no comparison. i just hope you dont think otherwise. unless your gonna cling to the old tired notion that sanders is bigger than tyson therefore making him better?

 

Not at all. I think Tyson was a vicious, accurate puncher but but he was easily frustrated and got confused by lesser boxers than the Klitschkos.

 

and on what grounds are making that claim?? every fight that went to the judges in tysons career he won and in convincing fashion. so so much for the Tyson gets easily frustrated" argument. tony tucker put up a good fight for a couple of rounds, even hit the guy with an uppercut that lifted him off the ground. that wouldve knocked out or frustrared lesser fighters, but tyson cam back and beat him for the remainder of the fight. tyson has overcome many different styles, i just dont see how make the assumption he was "easily frustrated" as he had overcome adversity on countless occassions.

 

Let's compare apples to apples.

The Rahman who KO'ed Lewis beats the Purrity, Sanders, and Brewster who KO'ed Klitschko...

 

Like who?