why's that? cause a legit all time heavy is picked to beat a klit? i love the klitschkos but i certainly don't think a rocky win is impossible. carnera was outboxed by men 60 pounds lighter than him and those guys weren't anywhere near rocky's class. carnera is a far cry from klit but size isn't everything and rocky was a demon
Adamek is top notch material. Haters and huggers can say whatever makes them feel good. Fact is fact.
he is but in no way shape or form has he earned the right to be compared with frazier and rocky, let alone placed above
Because they will never fight, but I would not discount Adamek. He can dance and he can box, he can even take a punch.
unfortunately, i don't think he's carried his power up to heavyweight. other than beating up on an old heavybag in golota, he's retained his skills but he's not terribly fast and doesn't have knockout power anymore. i just don't see him going to the top
Legit Heavy in 1950. I have nothing against Rocky but it's hard to picture all 5'10 185 pounds of him overcomming the Klit's MASSIVE size advantage.
Nah it's because those two have proved their HW mettle and Adamek has not yet. I like Adamek and will wait and see what his legacy is, but he has beaten a bad version of Golota and Chris Arreola another guy who also ain't done **** at HW despite his ranking (Arreolas best win is either chazz witherspoon or where's my pacheck mccline?)
Adamek has not fought enough at heavyweight yet, but he would knock Haye out, no doubt about it. Haye refused to fight Klitschkos, Adamek and he will avoid Chagaev. Haye is a contract breaker.