Klitschko has only defended the HW title TWICE....

in his mind it did.

 

that wlad took till his midthirties to work out how not to get wiped out by retired failures from the lewis era.

which brings me to ask why you are pretending you didn't see it.

Well done with your denial -now you have 2 questions to answer not just one. and if you deny these you'll have a third one to answer.

 

lewis got wiped out by a couple of failures himself.

 

He didn't work it out, Manny did and he started working with Manny (I don't know, 2004?) When he was 28. He reached his "prime" in 2006 when he was 30.

Wlad reached his prime around 30 and made your life miserable ever since. :yep

 

But he defeated them later on so it doesn't count. :roll:

 

they still count. i'd hardly call the second mccall fight revenge either. he got lucky mccall is an insane drug addict. he couldn't even phase the guy who was crying, with his hands down.

 

Wlad beat Brewster later....so you're saying the first fight didn't count either?

 

:good

 

that's more like it, and if he was prime at 30 then he was pretty much prime at 28.

no I was a fan until I started noticing how badly he was starting to treat hhis fans. but whatever you need to believe to keep you going.

 

they were number one contenders not failures. retired corrie never got to that position YEARS before he fought wlad when he was still prime.
so why are you comparing the two?

unavenged is what I wrote, again why are you comparing the two?

fail.

 

Wlad is not a lineal champin until he unifies all 3 major belts.

 

The emoticon represents sarcasm.

 

Can't remember if Brewster lost between beating Wladimir and Wladimir beating Byrd. If he hadn't, then obviously he ranked ahead of Wladimir and anyone bringing up "Wladimir vs. Byrd II was for the lineal!" are just idiots. But I don't have boxrec open so I can't say for sure.

 

McCall 2 was prime crackhead when Lewis fought him.

 

I guess Joe Louis wasn't lineal either. :roll: