Klitschko vs Arreolla/ Froch vs Dirrell whats the difference

Direll fight a very good and smar fight. Great boxing skills, old school. But there are very close rounds so Froch unfortunaly get the decision but no robbery.

I like the way Direll ist fighting! Great movement, fast jab and very fast hands.

 

Actually, a better analogy could be made on this topic with the first 8-9 rounds of the Wlad/Peter fight. Anyone who thought Froch did enough to win and was disgusted by Dirrel's tactics during the fight should agree that Peter did enough win his fight with Wlad in those aforementioned rounds based solely on the fact that he was "the aggressor" and kept coming forward in spite of Wlad's excessive holding, running and the fact that he repeatedly turned his back on Peter out of fear of his sloppy looping punches.

 

If cat runs around the mouse and plays with it before eating it doesn't mean cat is afraid of mouse.

 

Arreola threw punches and tried.

Dirrell ran, held, complained, fell down on canvas. Enough said.

 

Actually it is kind of comparison if you think about. Vitali fought very smart of moving around the ring keeping at distance with his longer reach and his 4 inch or 5 inch height advantage in which is the reason why he threw way more in the Arreola fight then Dirrell did in the Froch fight. Remember Dirrell and Froch are the same height and reach is 1 inch apart. Now if Dirrel was 4 inch taller then Froch, He would throw alot of punches more.

 

Arreola fought, threw punches. Dirrell ran, held, fell down on canvas and complained.

 

The difference is huge - Vitaliy knocks them out.

 

:deal

 

There you have it.

Now end this thread.

 

This thread fails

 

Did Froch throw 100 shots per round?

Did Dirrell's corner throw in the towel and did Dirrell cry?