Klitschko vs. Povetkin purse bid today

Who didn't know this already?

That's why Vitali was pissed that Solis went down in the 1st round, and why he carried Adamek as long as he did after having him on ***** street in rd 2 from a jab. RTL wants their money's worth.

 

Are you trolling? If you honestly believe that.. I hope to God you are still a high school or college student. It will scare the **** out of me to think a grown working adult in society has reached the levels of stupidity you just displayed with that quote.

Is RTL Magical? If Vitali fought on RTL against Byrd back in 2000 he would have quit in the 12th instead? Because he wanted to last a few more rounds prior to quitting for 'more commercials'?

So you are saying if Wlad was fighting on 'RTL' against Sanders... he would have gotten knocked out in the 9th instead of the 2nd .. for more money because of commercials?
You are the very definition of a Klittard. The sad thing is I think you carry that word as a 'badge of honor' on a online forum. 'Yes I'm a Klittard and I'm proud.. I defend the K bros on an online forum'. That is the peak of your life thus far isn't it? You stupid stupid stupid little raccoon.

 

With that completely irrational post, you describe yourself pretty well, alt/noob/troll

 

Yes.
This is how it goes. RTL makes advertisement after every round and more rounds more money!

 

Maybe people who aren't simple in the head?

:rofl :rofl :rofl

Awesome. That's some seriously funny ****.

Fanboys are the best. :happy

Especially fanboys who believe their idols are conspiring with their television company to fix/manipulate the results of their fights.

'The Klitschkos: good honest men of integrity, but chuck a couple of grand at them and the fights can be as long or short as you like'

 

But when David Haye nods and says "now!" and Fraudley takes a dive, Haye admits post-fight that he told people to bet on a rd.3 KO it's perfectly acceptable.

Boxing is a business, it's about revenue as much as anything. A Hayelord should be quite familiar with the concept, but I guess for simple minded fellows like you without business world experience, even concepts like this cab be elusive and too complex to comprehend.

I don't defend it, quite the opposite in fact, but I understand the reasons behind it.

 

What a predictable load of crap.

Well if Haye did bet in him self then it is wrong and he should've been punished.

Listen, you can try to talk as condescendingly to me as you like and act as if you're not talking the biggest load of **** ever, but that's not going to change the fact that you are.

You're spouting the exact kind of cringeworthy nonsense than fanboys get mocked for, and rightly so. You've got nothing. No evidence, no critical thinking applied, just a lack of common sense and blind adulation your two idols. Even if it is in the bizzare form of accusing them of conspiring to make additinal money on top of their purse by fixing the lengths of fights, it's naive fanboyism at its finest.

But I mean, if you have evidence you'd like to share (other than fights where the Klitschkos don't win by early KO) then I'd love to see it. I was under the impression that Vitali doesn't score many knockout these days as he arm punches due to the injuries he's suffered, and Wlad because he worked with a legendary trainer to develop a highly effective safety first style based on talking very very few risks - but obvious that's not the case, ands its simply because they're getting paid money on the sly to drag their fights out.

 

So if the media questioned Wlad about this he would admit that he prolongs his fights in order to make more money from advertising?

 

There is no way in hell that down syndrome poster 'Simplythebest' will understand what the above post means . I'll simplify it.



Wladimir no extent fight for commerical money
Wladimir extent fight because glass chin.

 

Oh you feel patronized? :|:|:|

So RTL doesn't make money on advertising? :rofl

If what I'm saying is such a load of ****, I think the burden is on YOU to prove it. But I'm sure you can't be bothered, you're too busy doing.....**** knows what you do all day besides bump your post count and cry out for attention.

 

I'm not sure you quite understand the concept of burden of proof. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You're claiming that the Klitschkos conspire with their TV company and advertisers to prolong fights to maximise their advertising revenue - that's an extraordinary claim. You need to provide some extraordinary evidence of this because 'RTL being paid for adverts' and 'Vitali being angry when Solis went down in the first' just don't cut it. Every TV channel in England that shows boxing makes huge money from advertising, the majority in the US do too - is this evidence that fighters there a manipulating the length of their fights? Is it ****.

I'm simply saying that the Klitchkos train for their fights, turn up and do their best to win in their style. Basically saying they're no different to 99.999999% of other fighters on the planet. I'm not sure this requires any evidence from me. Only someone making ridiculously unsubstantiated counter claims without the evidence to back it up would think otherwise.

 

In addition to helping spearhead private funding so that legislation for the chemical castration of pedophiles could be passed Russian businessman Andrey Ryabinsky who was behind the Hryunov bid is also the Vice President of The Russian Professional Boxing Federation.

 

This thread really has taken ******edness to the next level.

 

So Jisi was serious :!: well, it probably aint so, but it is not that weird to become a little suspicious.. Afterall, Froch has admitted to cary an opponent.

Most logical explanation is (of course) style-related.

 

Boxers sometimes carry weak opponents on purpose: Roy Jones Jr., Froch, VK, etc. Kids trying to look smart by laughing it off are making themselves look ******ed instead. Whether or not yhe brothers carry all of their opponents to make extra cash from commercial breaks - I seriously doubt it. Its stupid and dangerous. A freak loss to one of these bums on account of your fooling around spells huge losses that can never be compensated with a few minutes of TV ads.
So no, they dont in general. Maybe one or two, like I'm suspicious about Adamek, because VK wasnt trying at all and blatantly let him off the hook on quite a few occasions. Other than that I cant think of more examples to support this theory.