Klitschko will be stripped of his Ring title if he doesn't fight a top 5 contender

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ixx, Aug 26, 2012.


  1. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    I like this new policy. Now the ring champ can't sit on their title without fighting the other worthy challengers. The ring title is the only title worth paying attention to now so I like this move.
     
  2. luke

    luke Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,360
    9
    May 7, 2012
    this is correct ring mag is the only worthy title out there.
     
  3. Jаck

    Jаck P4P King Full Member

    773
    0
    Mar 4, 2012

    Don't force your subjective bias on others, douche. Ever.
     
  4. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,105
    22,177
    Jul 21, 2012
    Its my opinion. I don't give a **** if you don't like it.
     
  5. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    It's too bad the Ring was purchased by Golden Boy.
     
  6. thesandman

    thesandman Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    5
    Jul 29, 2004
    Right on the money there mate.

    I didn't agree they were better than an ABC belt, but at least they had some strict guidelines they adhered to.

    They started to slip with the 1 v 3 they brought in to wedge Vitali in as their champ on the wave of publicity he got after the Lewis fight.

    Now, as you've said, they're quickly back tracking in all their principles in a desperate attempt to remain relevant (and solvent).
     
  7. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    21
    Jul 28, 2008
    oh no! what next, will the IBO threaten to strip him too?