klitschkos are not top 20 all time

Wlad deserves in the top 15.

Maybe Top 10 if he continue winning and retires as a Champion.

 

Where's your list?

 

agree, to me wlad is top 30, and vitali barely makes top 50

 

Wlad is at least top 15, I don't get how it's even a question, and I'm not even a fan.

 

1. Re-arrange your list to put a greater emphasis on height. j/k

2. Wait for Wlad's career to finish. If he goes on for a bit longer without losing, he has a very good case based on longevity.

 

Tyson at #3?

 

I'm not a wlad fan but you can't deny he is a decnt heavyweight in a dying division having said that he defo not a top 20 mayb 30 not my 30 tho

 

Wlad's top 20 (Barely). His brother is not.

 

shocking list. Tyson at 3!! Lewis at 12!! Holyfield at 20 and below Bowe! I don't know which of thrdr is the most ridiculous

 

So Max Schmeling is better than Wladimir Klitschko?

 

Though it's kind of jacked up, that's true for the most part. Still, the Klitschkos have simply shown up and taken care of business. And though it may not always be pretty, they get the job done. They are in it for the "W"'s. The Klitschkos should not be faulted for their lack of great rivals. Their losses have proven to be flukes. Their wins are always by a landslide. The degree of domination by the Klitschkos should not be attributed to the heavyweight division being terrible, but rather to their skills, ring smarts, and athleticism.

If the same Ali from the 60's and 70's was fighting today, and say the Klitschkos fought back then, who would be Ali's modern day Frazier? Who would force Ali to show the greatness that he showed decades ago? The Klitschkos are the ones fighting today, so they are the ones stuck with the burden of proving their greatness amongst competitors that don't even come close. Many folks place unrealistic expectations on the Klitschko brothers, like knocking out Chambers and Johnson early if they're so good. They're damned if they do and damned if they don't.