Klitschkos vs Mike Tyson

Asser85 ignores everyone that owns his ass, at least he can agree with himself....

 

And then in the next fight he wipes out Carl Williams in devastating fashion.... :hi:

 

and everyone who doesn't share his Tyson nut hugging obsession. That's Gayser69 aka Azzir for you.

 

Its good to see that you are claiming Tyson was fvck all without Rooney as far as I am concerned, because I've always believed he was a hype job. So you are definitely saying that in the 8 months without Rooney, the " real " Tyson emerged, yeah?

Only some people put his less than stellar performance against Frank down to the fact that Givens divorced him just a matter of days before the fight. Which excuse do you prefer?

 

It borders ( the obsession ) on weirdness. A kind of strange man love.

 

Sweet! I was hoping we'd get another thread where people who can't stand Wlad match him up with their old retired heroes so they can fantasize about him curling up in a terrified ball the minute an "intimidating" opponent is across from him. :grouphug

 

It is weird. He will not be involved in a thread discussion and all of a sudden when somebody brings up anything about Tyson, he suddenly materializes to talk about how great Mike is. Tyson simply DID NOT live up to the 80's hype machine. He needs to accept that and move on. That being said, Mike was a very good fighter. A considerable challenge for anybody at his peak. He isnt blowing big bodied, ATG's like Lennox Lewis or the K-bros outa the ring in a round though

 

like he did against retired shot2**** sanders.

 

Tyson sparks both Klistckos.
Hes in a totally different league to these two overrated bums

 

Considering Steven Lott's opinion about the klitoris "twins", Klitschkos never had chance against Tyson.
( I think the klitschko's had only one choice .PRAYER FOR THE PED GOD.)
Maybe the nandrolone can help them.

Lott knows Tyson's talent better than every other living person on the earth.
The klit****s know only one thing: The klitoris- licking.

 

Not really sure how this kind of **** is getting your opinion across. Does the 10 years of domination bother you guys that much? Let me guess, all 3 of you are British? Insult the Klitschko's all you want, it doesnt change the fact that they are a H2H big task for anyone ever. I really wish guys who post stuff like this would just get a straight up IP ban. What good is your comment?

 

Being caught cold because he got arrogant equals fear now? Cool.

Hey, whatever helps you guys sleep at night. I'm not going to bust you or the rest of the British contingent's collective chops. It's been a pretty depressing decade for you guys waiting for Wlad to get beat in reality; the fantasy of a terrified Wlad being destroyed is all you've got left at this point. It'd be a **** move to argue against wishes like that :grouphug

 

Steve Lott is Tyson's bum boy, I'm sure I heard he fell in love with Mighty Mike.

 

I believe Wladimir Klitschko at his best beats Mike Tyson.
He's big, seasoned, experienced, professional, extremely powerful. A very measured boxer and a puncher. I'm talking about Wlad of , say, 2009 to 2014, not the one who fought Sanders and Brewster.

I'm not sure about Vitali. He always struck me as being too clumsy. He's certainly massive and very durable though. I think Tyson might be too busy for him and pound out a decision win with a sustained and blistering body attack.

I must say Tyson is the most overrated SHORT heavyweight of all-time.
Yes, it's amazing that he beat some decent taller fighters, but being 5'10 is a fr!ggin' limitation when you're up against the best of the big guys !