Kotelnik landed only 20 more punches but was outthrown by 400. What a robbery!

MichiganWarrior is one of the most ignorant posters on here man. It's hard to argue with him with his reading comprehension. Save your time and energy.

 

We good then. :good
I have seen robberies...trust me...this was not one of them.

 

:-(

 

...and lack of workrate.

 

You must be drunk then :deal

 

what so now you win for punching air?

Kotlenik won that fight CLEARLY.

 

Disagree, had he been more aggressive early. Alexander would have had more openings.

He was frustrating Alexander in the early rounds with terrific defense. But he did turn it up in the championship rounds. So I had him winning the fight by a close decision.

 

[url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/news.php?p=14099&more=1[/url]

Apply this time tested technique and tell me: who won?:smoke

 

**** off. That was a pure robbery. Plain and simple. Who gives CLEARLY the better shots? Who landed more?

 

The four elements of judging are:
1. Clean, effective punching: Kotelnik
2. Effective aggression: Kotelnik clearly
3. Ring Generalship: 50/50
4. Defense: Kotelnik clearly
The emphasis is always on the first element and the other three are arguably equal to each other in secondary importance.

I had it 117-112 for Kotelnik

 

I am a little LOL.

 

he threw 400 more punches but got outlanded by 20?

 

This is professional boxing, not the amateurs. Rounds aren't won by throwing a bunch of punches that land on gloves and arms, you win them by landing the cleaner and more effective punches. Kotelnik took Devon to school and beat his ass.

 

kind of reminds me of floyd-castillo... but of course your argument for that one started on the other end of the spectrum.