Kovalev > Triple Duck

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cisco Route, Nov 9, 2014.


Page 5 of 9
  1. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    If Kovalev beats Ward then I think there is a strong argument to be made that he's top 2 P4P.
     
    Cisco Route, Oct 5, 2015
    Cisco Route, Oct 5, 2015
    #61
  2. Uppercut_Artist

    Uppercut_Artist Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,213
    860
    Sep 22, 2015
    I'd like to see him beat Ward and Stevenson, and then lay claim to the #2 P4P spot.
    If Ward beats Kovalev and Stevenson, there'd be legit claim to the #1 P4P spot.
     
    Uppercut_Artist, Oct 5, 2015
    Uppercut_Artist, Oct 5, 2015
    #62
  3. QuadrupleG

    QuadrupleG MAZAFAKA Full Member

    4,309
    3
    May 3, 2014
    Kovalev was lucky to have two people with ballz, Hopkins and Pascal in his division. GGG will get there and even further after beating Lemieux and Canelo.

    Other similarities:
    Stevenson duck == Quillin duck
    Braehmer duck == Sturm duck
     
    QuadrupleG, Oct 5, 2015
    QuadrupleG, Oct 5, 2015
    #63
  4. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    No.

    Lemieux won't even be Bumlovkin's best win and he ain't getting Alvarez in the ring during the 2016 calender year.

    Try again...
     
    Cisco Route, Oct 5, 2015
    Cisco Route, Oct 5, 2015
    #64
  5. QuadrupleG

    QuadrupleG MAZAFAKA Full Member

    4,309
    3
    May 3, 2014
    Why should I try ? Nothing can overcome your hate towards Golovkin.
     
    QuadrupleG, Oct 5, 2015
    QuadrupleG, Oct 5, 2015
    #65
  6. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    the Golovkin syndrome :yep hate someone for no reason whatsoever :nut
     
    damian38, Oct 5, 2015
    damian38, Oct 5, 2015
    #66
  7. Cisco Route

    Cisco Route He Who Says Nay banned

    7,156
    5
    Apr 14, 2014
    Maybe you should try removing Bumlovkin's member from your mouth. Lemieux isn't his best opponent to date. His best win is Murray or Geale. That won't change after Saturday night...
     
    Cisco Route, Oct 5, 2015
    Cisco Route, Oct 5, 2015
    #67
  8. QuadrupleG

    QuadrupleG MAZAFAKA Full Member

    4,309
    3
    May 3, 2014
    Maybe you should try to remove all those black members from your a$$.

    Lemieux is by far is the most dangerous opponent. Murray and Geale didn't have any tools to trouble GGG. The only way to defeat him is to stop him, otherwise he will stop you. Lemieux has power to stop Golovkin. He also has speed and workrate to compete with Golovkin for at least a few rounds.
     
    QuadrupleG, Oct 5, 2015
    QuadrupleG, Oct 5, 2015
    #68
  9. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,545
    16,037
    Jul 19, 2004
    This is self-evident. Of course Kovalev is better (and far more proven) than Golovkin. Does anyone besides the most extremely over the top GGG fanboys seriously think otherwise?

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Oct 5, 2015
    Rumsfeld, Oct 5, 2015
    #69
  10. QuadrupleG

    QuadrupleG MAZAFAKA Full Member

    4,309
    3
    May 3, 2014
    "More proven", "better resume", etc. is not the same as "better". Only an idiot can mix those up.

    Golovkin is clearly better than Kovalev skill wise.
     
    QuadrupleG, Oct 5, 2015
    QuadrupleG, Oct 5, 2015
    #70
  11. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,527
    40,044
    Jan 22, 2015
    Kovalev would son GGG...
     
    drenlou, Oct 5, 2015
    drenlou, Oct 5, 2015
    #71
  12. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    Geale? Get real. Lemieux would be heavily favoured to take Geale out. Murray people might actually give a chance.
     
    Sugar 88, Oct 5, 2015
    Sugar 88, Oct 5, 2015
    #72
  13. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,545
    16,037
    Jul 19, 2004
    Referring to my previous post, based on your username, I'm willing to bet you fit nicely into the "most extremely over the top GGG fanboys" category. So your response is not the least bit surprising.

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Oct 5, 2015
    Rumsfeld, Oct 5, 2015
    #73
  14. QuadrupleG

    QuadrupleG MAZAFAKA Full Member

    4,309
    3
    May 3, 2014
    That is a very mature way of discussing things -- put another person into some category making him somehow not worth replying.

    Similarly, I can put you into a dumb category, as you don't see a difference between "more proven" and "better", or blind category if you don't see that Golovkin has a better footwork, punch variety, balance and chin than Kovalev.
     
    QuadrupleG, Oct 5, 2015
    QuadrupleG, Oct 5, 2015
    #74
  15. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,545
    16,037
    Jul 19, 2004
    Dude! Your username is "QuadrupleG"!
    :rofl
    That clearly signifies bias on your part, and I'd imagine anyone choosing such a username would be sharp enough to recognize that fact!

    I understand the difference quite well, thank you. Which is why I made it a point to amplify my answer previously by stating "...better (and far more proven)" instead of just saying "better" or "more proven".

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Oct 5, 2015
    Rumsfeld, Oct 5, 2015
    #75
Page 5 of 9