Kovalev / Ward 2. From a neutral perspective

About???

 

So you can't say how it has not been neutral. Yes the lols on you

 

Thank you
I can't see how genuine fans would celebrate a low blow for either. I can only think that many are agenda ridden casuals

 

Right here

 

How? Is that not Wards moniker?
I cant read your mind and could be wrong, but i can only guess with you questioning a question that you feel there may be more to what happened but don't want to post

 

First off, you dont decide who is neutral or not just because you want to address something how you see it. You are obviously someone who can only see things one certain way and not as a neutral, so have no place asking questions that you are trying to manipulate an answer to.
It doesnt matter if Kovalev was or wasnt reacting to legal body shots when he was hit with illegal body shots.
I will however address the times you say and give a neutral response.
Round 2, I saw Kovalev get hit with a shot that looked low to me and react to that. I think Kovalev was trying to get the ref to take notice of it.
The ref must have agreed as he gave time to Kovalev and told Ward to keep them up.
Not sure what you would think is or isnt neutral about that unless you feel the ref wasnt being neutral?
7th round was a round I scored for Ward. At around 2:39 of the round (20 secs of round), I felt Kovalev was hit low when coming out of a clinch, but he didnt complain.
In a clinch in round 7 (52 secs remaining), Kovalev complained and looked hurt from a punch that looked low to me.
At the end of round 7 in the replays, it showed Kovalev was hit with a low blow where the commentary (P Malignaggi), mentioned it was low and mentioned Ward snuck it it and said you get away with what you can.

Round 8, Wards big punch did hurt Kovalev and made him give ground. I dont think Kovalev was going to get knocked out as he was throwing jabs back but it did shake him up.
I was surprised Ward wasnt warned for ducking below the belt

Now I didnt once see Kovalev complain about legal body shots.

I looked again at the rounds you noted above, as you gave rounds, but can you tell me where you want me to look?

I didnt see Kovalev land a low jab in round 7. Can you say where? I think you are looking for something that isnt with that comment as I have watched the round again and cant see where a low jab was delivered by Sergei

Doesnt prove anything. This is you looking for an angle

I understand the rules. Fights have also been changed after when it has been found that somthing wasnt correct.
Fact is the fight was called off without a count after what looked a low blow.
P Malignaggi said some of those shots are low though, before the ref waved it off.

None of that is not being neutral, but calling what was said and happened.

I struggle to understand how legit fans would rate that as a good finish and good result for boxing

Malignaggi said after it was clearly low and alot of them were low and a clear low blow

 

You write
Ward controlled the fight from start to finish

then add
The 3 official judges, two of them had Ward up by a point, the 3rd judge had Kovalev up by 3 points.

Which shows Ward wasnt controlling throughout

 

Terrible when a fight is won on a low blow
Just think of all of the other fights where the result could have been different because of a low blow

 

Thanks champ
I will have a look

 

This content is protected

The shot looks lower than I realised. Kovalev was hit on the letters of his trunks