Krzysztof Wlodarczyk vs. Francisco Palacios II RBR

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Sep 22, 2012.


  1. easyLivin'

    easyLivin' Member Full Member

    236
    0
    Feb 8, 2009
    Wlodarczyk clearly won that fight. It was close but there is no way that Palacios could have got the decision.
    I wouldn't score it 117-112. It should be something like 116-112 or 115-113.
    Palacios was doing well until later rounds. He was a little bit out of gas and he should have boxed more defensively with a guy who can punch as hard as Wlodarczyk. Palacios was out on his feet and Pole should have knocked him out.
    Seriously, how can anybody see a robbery in this fight?

    I would love to see Wlodarczyk against Huck.
     
  2. Malden

    Malden 006 Full Member

    14,631
    1
    Aug 18, 2011
    Would be a great fight. Was close to happen last year.
     
  3. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    It's funny how they universally (coincidentally, not one single Pole on ESB had Chambers ahead despite Chambers winning polls on here easily) scored Adamek v Chambers for "their" fighter (as if Adamek gave a flying **** about these ******s) because of his excellent workrate that consisted of hitting thin air all night while scoring this fight for Wlod for clean punching.

    Dumbest ****s on ESB along with ultra klittards like Black Wall, Bremen, Slyk and so forth.
     
  4. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    That's funny besides the usual 7 haters on ESB 3 judges, boxing writers and the losing boxer himself had the fight the right way.:lol:

    And you ***** and moan and call us bias.:patsch
     
  5. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    A Pole fought that's how:lol:

    Now you have learned like i have learned although IB aka that 3rd judge does a million of these threads yet his scoring is on par with a novice.
     
  6. Bathory

    Bathory Active Member Full Member

    763
    1
    Jan 10, 2012
    No one on this site nearly as dumb as you dip****.
     
  7. Uncle Roger

    Uncle Roger Boxing Addict banned

    5,945
    0
    Oct 12, 2011
    Wlod won.

    I can't see how you can score the fight for Palacios...
     
  8. Serb Can

    Serb Can Active Member Full Member

    1,027
    0
    Mar 26, 2012
    :lol:
     
  9. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    I still have yet to find a single article backing this robbery claim...hmm wtf is going on?
     
  10. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    Those were two different fights. Adamek threw twice more punches than Palacios and Chambers was counterig precisely but sporadically while Wlodarczyk was countering in combinations and often on the offensive. Adamek was also never hurt in the fight and Palacios was hurt 4 or 5 times, 1 time very badly when the bell saved him.
     
  11. kurld

    kurld New Member Full Member

    8
    0
    Aug 24, 2011
    I guess some people here got carried away by IB's alternative scorning system. Wouldn't call it biased as he had Wlod winning against Green up until the KO, when that clearly wasn't the case. Maybe someone should explain here how a close round is scored when a hometown champ is fighting.
    Add some fearuns who didn't even see the fight and an inbred Briton.. and there you have it, another ESB robbery theory.
     
  12. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    and yet Palacios said it himself he knows he lost fair and square, no complaints

    you must of had a serious tantrum after you saw the judges scores posted here on ESB, instead of actually watching the fight, just because it was a Pole who fought and won CLEARLY

    can you give a link to a reasonable article fro another boxing site or elsewhere that called this fight a robbery and had it in favour of Pal?
     
  13. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    This time, Wlodarczyk was faster and more effective, and the judges agreed with scores of 116-112, 117-112, 116-113.
    -Dan Raphael - ESPN

    There were no knockdown and it was pretty much an even fight with the champion getting an edge in most rounds. Palacios was lucky to survive the tenth round after getting in trouble.
    - ***********

    Using a stiff jab and an occasional hard right hand, Wlodarczyk was able to control Palacios through most of the fight. Wlodarczyk did the better work and was able to land the harder shots. This was a vast improvement for Wlodarczyk over his last win against Palacios a year ago when Wlodarczyk beat Palacios by a controversial 12 round split decision in Poland. This time it wasn’t controversial.
    -boxing news

    Wlodarczyk won the first fight by split decision, but this time it was more definitive as he outworked Palacios en route to a 116-112, 117-112, 116-113 nod.
    -fightnews
     
  14. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    All those writers are Polish!
     
  15. Honor

    Honor Bóg i Ojczyzna Full Member

    725
    1
    Jul 26, 2011
    Umm..Diablo won the fight. First few rounds Palacios controlled the temp but from 5 or 6 on it was pretty much all Wlod.

    I had the first fight for Palacios and this one for Wlod.

    Learn to score a fight, IntentionalButt****...you obviously spend way, way too much time on a boxing forum, thats why you have lost your grasp on scoring, and overall the whole sport.