Krzysztof Wlodarczyk vs. Francisco Palacios RBR

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Apr 2, 2011.


  1. jordan1

    jordan1 Juan Lopez #1 Full Member

    11,491
    30
    Jun 20, 2009
    I don't see no one beating Wlod in poland even if he got KOed they would cry foul and give hime the win.:yep
     
  2. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    Agreed, i was speaking more along the lines of his rematch comment. The fact that Cunningham hasn't given him one makes me think a little less of him.

    Um from what i remember he got poked in the eye.
     
  3. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
    Well, Adamek was badly rocked by USS en route to winning a controversial split decision in front of his 'home' crowd and polish contingent in New Jersey, so if that's an ass whipping, then anything is.

    The amount of bias in this thread from you E-Euro's is just ridiculous.

    Yeah, but what I'm saying is that it's not comparable to the other robberies you alluded to. Ross was winning, but only by a few points, courtesy of the KD. Otherwise, it was a close fight, and was starting to swing in Cunninghams favour. USS comes on strong late in fights, so anything could have happened, it's not like Ross had a clear cut win stolen from him, not even close.
     
  4. Lenin Cat

    Lenin Cat Member Full Member

    206
    0
    Apr 24, 2010
    Amazing fight, what a war. 118-112 is the right score. Wlodarczyk's punches(both of them) clearly won him the fight.
     
  5. val

    val Member Full Member

    282
    0
    Feb 12, 2005
    I wasn't scoring rounds, but for me Diablo didn't win any round. Perhaps I would find a few even ones, but that's it. I was watching very bad quality online stream though, so maybe I missed something.
     
  6. RedWhite

    RedWhite New Member Full Member

    38
    0
    Jan 7, 2011
    Can't say i would give a clear decision for either one.

    Palacios blew it, he had a great chance. Wlod was coming of an injury, he was far from his best. Yet Palacios decided to do nothing.
     
  7. jordan1

    jordan1 Juan Lopez #1 Full Member

    11,491
    30
    Jun 20, 2009

    They did when they handed them the payolla money:hey
     
  8. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007
    lol, Adamek had Steve kissing the canvas 3 times. GTFO.

    If Stevie can't bring his homies from Phili to Jersey, than that's his fault.
     
  9. popejking

    popejking Adamek Full Member

    4,160
    1
    Mar 27, 2009
    Ross's eye was cut by Cunningham's thumb as I remeber. However it wasnt intentional. To me it should be a NC.
     
  10. RedWhite

    RedWhite New Member Full Member

    38
    0
    Jan 7, 2011
    They did a hell of a job trying to rob Adamek in that fight.
     
  11. HMSTempleGarden

    HMSTempleGarden Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,686
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    Those cards were a joke plain and simple.

    where the **** did 118-112 come from? Wlod barely threw a punch all night as he tried to find Palacios.

    Had Palacios winning 116-113, and Wlod knew he lost that fight and muted his celebrations. He is due Palacios a rematch after that bollocks that was a blatant robbery.

    118-112 - **** OFF
     
  12. jordan1

    jordan1 Juan Lopez #1 Full Member

    11,491
    30
    Jun 20, 2009
    And Wlod did :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  13. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Exactly
     
  14. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    Look who is talking.

    badly rocked? round 4 you mean. no

    controversial. no

    It was a close fight but when you drop a guy 3 times you're entitled to say he whooped him. Somewhat of a paradox but a justified one.
     
  15. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    :rofl pretending that Adamek's win was controversial or wrong.