Léo Santa Cruz vs. Carl Frampton II

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Aug 2, 2016.


  1. Gollywog

    Gollywog Member Full Member

    108
    3
    Jun 13, 2013
    LSC: "Yeah I want a rematch, this time we'll do it in LA!"

    Err, no you won't, you'll do it in Belfast.
     
  2. rhin0z>

    rhin0z> Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,405
    1,089
    Jul 13, 2014
    oh danny boy the pipes are calling..................
     
  3. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    If they rematch ...what will LSC do different?
    He already gave it more or less his best shot.
    Carl is just better, that's all.
     
  4. Southpawology

    Southpawology Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,288
    272
    Dec 16, 2013
    He was the champ, he gave Frampton a shot so he deserves the chance to win his belt back, this was an ultra competitive fight that could have gone either way

    He deserves it if hes willing
     
  5. Kingcrolla

    Kingcrolla Member Full Member

    233
    11
    May 7, 2016
    for a million dollar purse pls stfu
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,422
    83,293
    Nov 30, 2006
    Butt hurt about what, exactly?

    Show me where I claimed they didn't want a rematch?

    Idiot. Quit jumping at shadows.
     
  7. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,029
    Feb 19, 2007
    i think leo has a very good chance at regaining his title. he tried to box the first part of the fight and lost most rds because thats not his bread and butter. once he started to apply more pressure and just let his hands go, which is his game, he got himself right back in the fight.
    this fight was so close that a different fight plan from either fighter could result in a very different outcome.
     
  8. panchman69

    panchman69 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,111
    1,892
    Sep 10, 2012
    santa cruz needs to hit the weight room. he has no muscle
     
  9. On_The_Ropes

    On_The_Ropes Active Member Full Member

    946
    254
    Jan 3, 2016
    I would rather see Frampton fight Selby, they can rematch further down the line if LSC gets another notable win under his belt.
     
  10. Gollywog

    Gollywog Member Full Member

    108
    3
    Jun 13, 2013
    In the opening post. You are an awful poster. You need to get a life, loser.
     
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,422
    83,293
    Nov 30, 2006
    Wrong, moron. Read it again.
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,422
    83,293
    Nov 30, 2006
    Takes you 90min to read a single paragraph with full comprehension, dopey? Why am I not surprised?

    There was honestly nothing in the OP to be interpreted by any rational person as being any kind of attack or criticism of Frampton or Team Jackal on my part (note that NOBODY else but you even took it that way. Not one person..)

    If any sort of gentle ribbing was even implied regarding the situation it was even-handedly distributed in both directions- in Haymon's for sleazily backdooring a mandatory immediate rematch clause into the wording of the contract in an unclear manner (if that indeed bears out and the Ring source is correct), and in Frampton's and his team's for not having noticed it. Hardly anything to merit you white-knighting for Carl - incidentally, for whom I scored the first contest rather comfortably and was quite happy for, and for whom I'll be ****ing ROOTING in the rematch if we get it.

    Nowhere does observing the fact (or even having a chuckle at the silliness of the situation, most of the absurdity stemming from the childish tactics of Haymon if he did this instead of just negotiating a rematch clause openly) imply that Frampton is averse to a rematch. Were any of us in his shoes, however, you have to figure we quite rightfully would be annoyed to find that we'd signed a contract that puts limits on your options in the immediate future having not initially realized that you weren't free as the new champ to do as you please.

    Stop automatically reading agendas or subtext into things where there are none. ESPECIALLY with me, thank you very much, because if you look through my ten year history of posting here or ask pretty much anybody that has been here for any length of time within that decade you'd know that I keep above the fray when it comes to all those stupid little hidden-meaning games, even if 90% of the juvenile idiots on this and other boxing forums do. Meanwhile you are some nobody questioning my intentions for absolutely no discernible reason? GTFO, troll.
     
  13. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    Was it worth it? :hey. :D
     
  14. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,161
    15,956
    Jul 25, 2014
    Lol damn IB chill. He misinterpreted what you said, and tried to play it off, it's not worth getting that worked up over.
     
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,422
    83,293
    Nov 30, 2006
    Nah fam. Sucka free Tuesday! :ibutt