Lamont Brewster 2002-2004 vs Deontay Wilder

Brewster is too durable and hits hard enough to bundle Wilder otta there.

 

Wilder is destroyed early and brutally. Brewster is exactly the sort of fighter who would annihilate that fraud.

 

Bruno had a decent chin. He just had terrible recuperative instincts and a leaky gastank. He'd definitely have enough skills and physicality to beat Wilder, and his long jab would cause Jonty all sorts of problems. Look at the Duhaupas fight for comparison. Can't really see this one going Wilder's way at all.

 

If I could pick one guy (outside of the bigger names) who'd beat Wilder it'd be someone like Brewster. Iron chin, huge punch, go for broke never say die attitude. Wilder would need to box the fight of his life keeping that pitbull off him.

 

And ftr.....

There is a JOURNEYMAN who would beat Wilder.

Names Ross the Boss.
He'd take everything Wilder could throw and keep coming till Wilder crashed to the canvas after 5 rds.

 

Brewster would knock his head into cheap seats with his left hook

 

Purrity could slug hard and eat power punches like they were popcorn. If he'd had any actual skills all the champs of those days would have been playing basketball or cutting their legs off to make cruiser.

 

Purity was an animal. Whether most on here want to admit to it or not. Check out his draw against Morrison. Ate an ATOMIC Duke left hook, I think it was the 4th, and stayed upright. If you look at the timing of that shot and listen to the impact, 98% of heavyweights would have hit the deck.

 

was he fcuk lying shyt. he challenged for a recognised title once and lost. only reason he got a stint with the minor title was down to wladdie being weak.

huge lie u mean.

 

Herol has gone off the rails and over a gorge ^

 

u'd know being a permanent resident of it.

 

Looks like Herol's little sister got hold of his phone ^

 

Marco Huck

 

That was Wlad's undoing, not Wilders.

 

Sharp analysis there Blizzy, you've really swayed me to your side of things!