Lamont will not be the man to conquer Cuenca's undefeated reign either what are the odds on a Cuenca KO, I could make a shitload of vCash by betting very little, if he could stop Peterson:yep
Well in his last seven bouts Peterson has been called the more feather-fisted man in the ring (after having been spoiled before that being the "puncher" against Fuller, Bradley, Blain, Tyner and Castaneda). I guess he's had enough. :yep
Where do they find these guys to put on American TV. He's undefeated, but only has 2 KO's in 49 fights. That's an even lower KO % than Rod Salka. I hope this isn't true. If they put forth that showcase card only to get Peterson vs. Cuenca and Garcia vs. Postol I will be very disappointed.
Here's Haymon's future assassin.:dealThis is Haymon's "girl", he's hotter than Kellie Maloney http://www.eros.com/dynamic-images/...corts/eros-sandiego-ts-pornstar-foxxy-fo8.jpg
Ive always wondered when Cuenca would get a shot. He doesnt KO guys...big f'in deal! Winning fights is the only thing that matters. In terms of ranking, what problem do people have with Cuenca getting a title fight? He won a title emilinator, so he gets a shot. If someones to blame, then blame the sanctioning body
47-0 :toney It sure isn't easy for a guy without punching power to get a record like that, even with the subpar competiton he faced thus far. I would laugh my ass off when they end up having to gift Peterson a decision :!:
That's the bad part. If and I repeat, IF Peterson were to get a gift decision everyone will forget by the following week and life will go on. Just like the Garcia vs Herrera gift. These guys aren't suppose to win and if they do, they are robbed! He would need a KO to win but he is no Matthysse to KO PEDerson.
