Lamont should to say NO rematch

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by oli, Dec 11, 2011.


  1. Trickster

    Trickster Member Full Member

    174
    0
    Mar 18, 2010
    Ah, I was under the impression it was voluntary. Disregard my last post then.
     
  2. anthony jr

    anthony jr Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,089
    0
    Dec 29, 2008
    was hoping some one would say that. khan had to fight him but i think lamont should go after bradley avenge that loss then you are the kingpin off the 140lb division then he calls the shots
     
  3. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Oli, still at it. Genuine mong.
     
  4. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    8,804
    1
    Mar 11, 2010
    Lazarus. You are a genuine ****** who only watches boxing to see khan with his top off. Your are in mourning and if khan knew about you he would be creeped the **** out.

    Lamont Peterson new champ:hi:
     
  5. itsa huge bitch

    itsa huge bitch Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,264
    1
    Mar 9, 2011
    yous yanks are a ****ing joke.and i mean it..how bitter do use sound.not only was it took from khan because of a dickhead ref,use actually use bollix logic to suggest khan dosnt deserve a rematch..everychampion deserves a rematch esp when they get handed dirt like that..****ing dirtbags
     
  6. SweetHome_Bama

    SweetHome_Bama Loyal Member banned

    32,270
    3
    Apr 30, 2010
    Definitely take the rematch, but make Khan pay for it, now and in the future, plus rematch rights with a very large buyout clause. Time for business.
     
  7. StreetsOfGold

    StreetsOfGold Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,252
    1
    Nov 9, 2008
    lol at americans pretending lamont won the fight at best it was a draw
     
  8. bazza12

    bazza12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,561
    5
    Sep 26, 2009
    Listen, if Lamont wants to go ahead and rematch Bradley he could. Will it be his first choice? No. Why?
    Because a Khan rematch in Vegas makes more money.
    Because Khan-Peterson was actually entertaining.
    Because the rewards of beating Khan outright are far greater than doing the same with Bradley.

    You are right, Khan now is not the best in the division. Peterson is. A rematch would give us a Ring champ if I'm correct?

    Your anger doesn't make sense. Any true champ/ex-champ should want to avenge a loss. What's the problem there?

    As for Peterson getting in with Mayweather, get real. If Khan had beaten Cayo and scraped by Peterson then started demanding a matchup with the pound for pound best you would be more angry than you are now.

    It's quite amusing because someone you clearly dislike just lost and the day after you have already started 2 threads criticizing him!

    Moron.
     
  9. SweetHome_Bama

    SweetHome_Bama Loyal Member banned

    32,270
    3
    Apr 30, 2010
    Best in the division is clearly Bradley and has been for a long time.
     
  10. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    use?:lol::lol::patsch
     
  11. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    i agree he should fight a few times before rematching khan, let khan rematch maidana and prescott then fight a khan rematch in 2013. why does khan get to call the shots when lamonts the champ.
     
  12. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    khan would definetly not have given Peterson a rematch if he got the nod on the judges cards
     
  13. SweetHome_Bama

    SweetHome_Bama Loyal Member banned

    32,270
    3
    Apr 30, 2010
    Money.

    Like I said, give him the rematch, let that **** be in the UK, be he should get a 50/50 split of the UK television and gate. He should get a 80/20 split of US broadcast rights. He should also get 30% of the gross for Khan's next 10 fights.

    Give Khan what he wants, but make him pay for it.
     
  14. bazza12

    bazza12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,561
    5
    Sep 26, 2009
    Judging from what?

    Khan beat Maidana, Kotelnik, Malignaggi and Judah.

    Bradley beat Witter, Holt, Peterson and Alexander.

    Please explain the "clear" differential in performance there, because right now I'd have it as:
    1 - Peterson
    2 - Khan
    3 - Bradley
     
  15. Popshots

    Popshots Active Member Full Member

    1,458
    1
    Jan 4, 2005
    Are you the ref from last night what are you doing on here lol. C'mon dude. I was pulling for Peterson because he was the underdog, but you can clearly see it was a hometown decision and I respect that. D.C takes care of their own, but a robbery is a robbery.

    Peterson and his people should make sure that if they fight khan again they get more money considering he is the champ now. Khan needs Peterson more than he needs him IMO. Khan has been talking about moving up anyway.